Colton Smith vs Keegan Smith — Cleveland CH Semi-final

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
USA2
Colton Smith
#181ATP
1577ELO
1566Hard ELO
$154kYTD
$480kCAREER
23 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 February 2026
hard
USA
Keegan Smith
#204ATP
1421ELO
1395Hard ELO
28 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWLL
Smith C.
7-6 6-1
Smith K.
Smith C.
7762
Smith K.
6410

Colton Smith defeated Keegan Smith 7-6 6-1 in the Cleveland CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Colton Smith came in ranked #181, defending the title.

Key context

  • Match story: Colton Smith came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Smith C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Smith K.

Smith K.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Smith C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Smith C.Smith K.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
75%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
55%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
67%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
68%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
6.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (26 vs 30). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Smith C.Smith K.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
62
26
Break points saved·Slight edge
94
84
Break points won·Dominant
52
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
48
Tiebreaks·Even
8
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Smith C.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Smith K.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.1+171 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Hard Elo 1395
6.7Overall Elo 1577
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1421
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
5.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.0
Minutes 14d
8.2
4.0
3-set count
Prev. match
8.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Smith C.Smith K.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
84

Smith C.: 19 days rest · Smith K.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Smith C.[2]
Gojo B.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Gojo B.
Sheehy J.
6-37-68
Smith C.[2]
Smith K.
7-646-1
Quarter-finals
Gojo B.
Vandecasteele Q.
6-46-4
Smith K.
Kozlov S.[7]
6-36-2
Smith C.[2]
Dostanic S.
6-47-64
Sheehy J.
Milavsky D.
7-646-707-66
R16
Smith K.
Ghibaudo A.
7-647-5
Dostanic S.
Langmo C.
6-36-786-4
Smith C.[2]
Jones B.
6-17-5
Milavsky D.
Martin D.
7-616-3
Sheehy J.
Martin A.[6]
7-636-3
Gojo B.
Boyer T.[3]
6-46-2
Kozlov S.[7]
Perot R.
7-653-66-3
Vandecasteele Q.
Boulais J.
6-26-4
R32
Kozlov S.[7]
Stebe C.
3-66-26-3
Martin D.
Shimabukuro S.[1]
6-36-4
Milavsky D.
Bigun K.
6-46-3
Martin A.[6]
Ilagan A.
7-673-67-5
Gojo B.
Kennedy J.
6-06-0
Boulais J.
Battle L.
6-36-4
Vandecasteele Q.
Cassone M.[5]
7-626-3
Perot R.
Friend J.
6-24-66-3
Ghibaudo A.
Tomic B.[4]
6-16-3
Langmo C.
Rybakov A.[8]
7-666-3
Dostanic S.
Kuhar M.
6-16-2
Jones B.
Shah A.
4-66-36-4
Smith C.[2]
Kingsley C.
3-67-666-4
Sheehy J.
Poling K.
7-617-64
Boyer T.[3]
Johns G.
6-46-4
Smith K.
Zink T.
6-36-757-63