Joshua Sheehy vs Karl Poling — Cleveland CH Round of 32

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Joshua Sheehy
#586ATP
29 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 February 2026
hard
USA
Karl Poling
#506ATP
1314ELO
1320Hard ELO
26 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWLWW
Sheehy J.
7-6 7-6
Poling K.
Sheehy J.
77772
Poling K.
61640

Joshua Sheehy defeated Karl Poling 7-6 7-6 in the Cleveland CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sheehy J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Poling K.

Poling K.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Sheehy J.

Serve advantage — Poling K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sheehy J.Poling K.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.4
1.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.5
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (17 vs 21). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sheehy J.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Poling K.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
3.4
Surface form
6.7
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
7.2
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sheehy J.Poling K.
Freshness·
—
98

Poling K.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Smith C.[2]
Gojo B.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Gojo B.
Sheehy J.
6-37-68
Smith C.[2]
Smith K.
7-646-1
Quarter-finals
Gojo B.
Vandecasteele Q.
6-46-4
Smith K.
Kozlov S.[7]
6-36-2
Smith C.[2]
Dostanic S.
6-47-64
Sheehy J.
Milavsky D.
7-646-707-66
R16
Smith K.
Ghibaudo A.
7-647-5
Dostanic S.
Langmo C.
6-36-786-4
Smith C.[2]
Jones B.
6-17-5
Milavsky D.
Martin D.
7-616-3
Sheehy J.
Martin A.[6]
7-636-3
Gojo B.
Boyer T.[3]
6-46-2
Kozlov S.[7]
Perot R.
7-653-66-3
Vandecasteele Q.
Boulais J.
6-26-4
R32
Kozlov S.[7]
Stebe C.
3-66-26-3
Martin D.
Shimabukuro S.[1]
6-36-4
Milavsky D.
Bigun K.
6-46-3
Martin A.[6]
Ilagan A.
7-673-67-5
Gojo B.
Kennedy J.
6-06-0
Boulais J.
Battle L.
6-36-4
Vandecasteele Q.
Cassone M.[5]
7-626-3
Perot R.
Friend J.
6-24-66-3
Ghibaudo A.
Tomic B.[4]
6-16-3
Langmo C.
Rybakov A.[8]
7-666-3
Dostanic S.
Kuhar M.
6-16-2
Jones B.
Shah A.
4-66-36-4
Smith C.[2]
Kingsley C.
3-67-666-4
Sheehy J.
Poling K.
7-617-64
Boyer T.[3]
Johns G.
6-46-4
Smith K.
Zink T.
6-36-757-63