Lin Zhu vs Elena Micic — W75 Brisbane Round of 32

W75 Brisbane · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Lin Zhu
CHN
Lin Zhu
#142WTA
1674ELO
1647Hard ELO
32 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 February 2026
hard
AUS
Elena Micic
#310WTA
1399ELO
1380Hard ELO
21 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLLLLWW
Zhu L.
6-4 6-4
Micic E.
Zhu L.
662
Micic E.
44–

Lin Zhu defeated Elena Micic 6-4 6-4 in the W75 Brisbane round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Lin Zhu came in ranked #142.

Key context

  • Match story: Lin Zhu edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zhu L.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Micic E.

Micic E.serving54% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Zhu L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Zhu L.Micic E.
14
Serve
—
60
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Zhu L.Micic E.
1st serve in·Even
68%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
42%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
56%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
53%
Aces / match·Even
2.9
2.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.8
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (23 vs 24). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zhu L.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Micic E.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.3+267 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.7Hard Elo 1380
9.3Overall Elo 1674
ELO gap
0.7Overall Elo 1399
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
5.2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zhu L.Micic E.
Freshness·
100
—

Zhu L.: 16 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Gibson T.
Hibino N.
6-37-67
Jones E.
Zhu L.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Hibino N.
Ma Y.
7-626-1
Gibson T.
Zhu L.
6-36-4
Jones E.
Gibson T.
3-67-646-3
Zhu L.
Preston T.
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Ma Y.
Jones E.
6-46-4
Hibino N.
Preston T.
3-66-27-5
Zhu L.
Saito S.
6-36-0
Gibson T.
Kinoshita H.
6-16-4
Preston T.
Abe H.
6-36-2
Zhu L.
Hibino N.
6-11-1
Jones E.
Kuramochi M.
6-22-66-1
Gibson T.
Ma Y.
6-46-3
R16
Zhu L.
Okamura K.
6-06-1
Hibino N.
Jang S.
6-36-3
Gibson T.
Zhang Y.
6-26-1
Jones E.
Subasic A.
6-26-2
Preston T.
Cabrera L.
5-76-16-2
Ma Y.
Kawaguchi N.
6-16-3
Kinoshita H.
Abe H.
6-16-3
Saito S.
Sato N.
6-24-66-3
Kuramochi M.
Saito S.
2-66-46-3
Preston T.
Kinoshita H.
6-46-1
Jones E.
Jeong B.
7-57-63
Gibson T.
Sibai J.
6-26-0
Ma Y.
Fry S.
6-26-2
Zhu L.
Naito Y.
6-36-2
Hibino N.
Sema E.
6-06-4
Abe H.
Zhang Y.
6-46-2
R32
Subasic A.
Jeong B.
7-56-4
Jones E.
Yuan C.
6-26-1
Cabrera L.
Barry M.
3-66-26-4
Abe H.
Shibahara E.
6-16-1
Kinoshita H.
Naito Y.
6-46-1
Jang S.
Shek C.
4-66-37-67
Saito S.
Khan L.
6-26-2
Kawaguchi N.
Rokusek S.
6-26-2
Hibino N.
Da Silva Fick G.
6-46-1
Zhu L.
Micic E.
6-46-4
Preston T.
Zhang R.
6-16-0
Sato N.
Hanatani N.
6-26-2
Gibson T.
Sato H.
6-46-2
Zhang Y.
Fry S.
6-26-4
Okamura K.
Mildren S.
6-46-0
Ma Y.
Hule P.
6-746-17-5
Saito S.
Cabrera L.
6-767-56-4
Naito Y.
Thompson B.
7-56-4
Sema E.
Khan L.
6-27-63
Fry S.
Subasic A.
4-67-626-3
Abe H.
Shibahara E.
7-56-3
Preston T.
Shek C.
6-36-3
Gibson T.
Wan I.
6-36-0
Jeong B.
Micic E.
6-26-2
Zhu L.
Tse E.
6-36-0
Kinoshita H.
Defalco J.
6-16-2
Kuramochi M.
Alame R.
6-06-3
Zhang Y.
Russell T.
6-16-1
Sibai J.
Sato N.
2-66-26-3
Ma Y.
Kawaguchi N.
6-06-0
Jones E.
Jang S.
6-46-4
Hibino N.
Da Silva Fick G.
6-16-2