Chun Hsin Tseng vs Facundo Mena — Rosario CH Round of 16

Rosario CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE6
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1541Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 February 2026
clay
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#331ATP
1427ELO
1406Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
Tseng C.
6-3 7-5
Mena F.
Tseng C.
672
Mena F.
350

Chun Hsin Tseng defeated Facundo Mena 6-3 7-5 in the Rosario CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Chun Hsin Tseng came in ranked #234, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tseng C.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Mena F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Serve advantage — Mena F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tseng C.Mena F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.8
7.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.7
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (29 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tseng C.Mena F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
9
Break points saved·Dominant
83
57
Break points won·Slight edge
15
7
Deciding sets·Even
31
28
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tseng C.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Mena F.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.4+135 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.6Clay Elo 1406
6.2Overall Elo 1554
ELO gap
3.8Overall Elo 1427
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
6.6
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
6.9
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tseng C.Mena F.
Freshness·Dominant
100
66

Tseng C.: 21 days rest · Mena F.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Ugo Carabelli C.[1]
Burruchaga R.[5]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Ugo Carabelli C.[1]
Cerundolo J.[4]
7-56-1
Burruchaga R.[5]
Tseng C.[6]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Cerundolo J.[4]
Pellegrino A.[8]
6-46-3
Tseng C.[6]
Aboian V.
6-26-1
Burruchaga R.[5]
Boscardin Dias P.
7-636-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[1]
Dellien H.[7]
6-46-2
R16
Pellegrino A.[8]
Ambrogi L.
1-66-46-2
Tseng C.[6]
Mena F.
6-37-5
Ugo Carabelli C.[1]
Diaz Acosta F.
5-76-47-64
Dellien H.[7]
La Serna J.
6-36-2
Cerundolo J.[4]
Torres J.
3-66-46-3
Aboian V.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
7-56-4
Burruchaga R.[5]
Olivieri G.
6-36-1
Boscardin Dias P.
Comesana F.[2]
6-43-66-3
R32
Ugo Carabelli C.[1]
Justo G.
6-16-0
Diaz Acosta F.
Ribeiro Marcondes I.
7-636-0
La Serna J.
Olivo R.
6-42-66-3
Dellien H.[7]
Agamenone F.
6-26-3
Mena F.
Monteiro T.
7-57-63
Burruchaga R.[5]
Midon L.
6-16-1
Tseng C.[6]
Casanova H.
6-12-0
Torres J.
Barrena A.
6-36-1
Ambrogi L.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-47-64
Pellegrino A.[8]
Estevez J.
6-42-66-4
Olivieri G.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-36-1
Comesana F.[2]
Kicker N.
7-56-3
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Collarini A.
3-66-26-1
Boscardin Dias P.
Cecchinato M.
6-736-37-5
Aboian V.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-42-66-4
Cerundolo J.[4]
Villanueva G.
6-16-0