Dan Martin vs Sho Shimabukuro — Cleveland CH Round of 32

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CAN
Dan Martin
1313ELO
1276Hard ELO
27 yrs · 175 cm
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 February 2026
hard
Sho Shimabukuro
JPN1
Sho Shimabukuro
#90ATP
1672ELO
1606Hard ELO
$268kYTD
$1.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWWLW
Martin D.
6-3 6-4
Shimabukuro S.
Martin D.
662
Shimabukuro S.
340

Dan Martin defeated Sho Shimabukuro 6-3 6-4 in the Cleveland CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Dan Martin closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Martin D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Shimabukuro S.

Shimabukuro S.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Martin D.

Serve advantage — Shimabukuro S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Martin D.Shimabukuro S.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
54%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
33%
37%
Break points saved·Even
66%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.2
6.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (19 vs 35). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Martin D.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Shimabukuro S.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
1.2Hard Elo 1276
Surface ELO
8.8+330 Hard Elo edge
1.2Overall Elo 1313
ELO gap
8.8Overall Elo 1672
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.4
Surface form
7.1
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
3.9
4.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Martin D.Shimabukuro S.
Freshness·Slight edge
98
93

Martin D.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Shimabukuro S.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Smith C.[2]
Gojo B.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Gojo B.
Sheehy J.
6-37-68
Smith C.[2]
Smith K.
7-646-1
Quarter-finals
Gojo B.
Vandecasteele Q.
6-46-4
Smith K.
Kozlov S.[7]
6-36-2
Smith C.[2]
Dostanic S.
6-47-64
Sheehy J.
Milavsky D.
7-646-707-66
R16
Smith K.
Ghibaudo A.
7-647-5
Dostanic S.
Langmo C.
6-36-786-4
Smith C.[2]
Jones B.
6-17-5
Milavsky D.
Martin D.
7-616-3
Sheehy J.
Martin A.[6]
7-636-3
Gojo B.
Boyer T.[3]
6-46-2
Kozlov S.[7]
Perot R.
7-653-66-3
Vandecasteele Q.
Boulais J.
6-26-4
R32
Kozlov S.[7]
Stebe C.
3-66-26-3
Martin D.
Shimabukuro S.[1]
6-36-4
Milavsky D.
Bigun K.
6-46-3
Martin A.[6]
Ilagan A.
7-673-67-5
Gojo B.
Kennedy J.
6-06-0
Boulais J.
Battle L.
6-36-4
Vandecasteele Q.
Cassone M.[5]
7-626-3
Perot R.
Friend J.
6-24-66-3
Ghibaudo A.
Tomic B.[4]
6-16-3
Langmo C.
Rybakov A.[8]
7-666-3
Dostanic S.
Kuhar M.
6-16-2
Jones B.
Shah A.
4-66-36-4
Smith C.[2]
Kingsley C.
3-67-666-4
Sheehy J.
Poling K.
7-617-64
Boyer T.[3]
Johns G.
6-46-4
Smith K.
Zink T.
6-36-757-63