Daniel Milavsky vs Dan Martin — Cleveland CH Round of 16

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Daniel Milavsky
#335ATP
1349ELO
1337Hard ELO
24 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 February 2026
hard
CAN
Dan Martin
1313ELO
1276Hard ELO
27 yrs · 175 cm
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
Milavsky D.
7-6 6-3
Martin D.
Milavsky D.
7762
Martin D.
6130

Daniel Milavsky defeated Dan Martin 7-6 6-3 in the Cleveland CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Milavsky D.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Martin D.

Martin D.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Milavsky D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Milavsky D.Martin D.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
34%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
73%
67%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.8
5.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.7
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (12 vs 19). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Milavsky D.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Martin D.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.9+61 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.1Hard Elo 1276
5.5Overall Elo 1349
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1313
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
2.4
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
6.3
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Milavsky D.Martin D.
Freshness·Slight edge
68
79

Milavsky D.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 76 games (7d) · Martin D.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 27 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Smith C.[2]
Gojo B.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Gojo B.
Sheehy J.
6-37-68
Smith C.[2]
Smith K.
7-646-1
Quarter-finals
Gojo B.
Vandecasteele Q.
6-46-4
Smith K.
Kozlov S.[7]
6-36-2
Smith C.[2]
Dostanic S.
6-47-64
Sheehy J.
Milavsky D.
7-646-707-66
R16
Smith K.
Ghibaudo A.
7-647-5
Dostanic S.
Langmo C.
6-36-786-4
Smith C.[2]
Jones B.
6-17-5
Milavsky D.
Martin D.
7-616-3
Sheehy J.
Martin A.[6]
7-636-3
Gojo B.
Boyer T.[3]
6-46-2
Kozlov S.[7]
Perot R.
7-653-66-3
Vandecasteele Q.
Boulais J.
6-26-4
R32
Kozlov S.[7]
Stebe C.
3-66-26-3
Martin D.
Shimabukuro S.[1]
6-36-4
Milavsky D.
Bigun K.
6-46-3
Martin A.[6]
Ilagan A.
7-673-67-5
Gojo B.
Kennedy J.
6-06-0
Boulais J.
Battle L.
6-36-4
Vandecasteele Q.
Cassone M.[5]
7-626-3
Perot R.
Friend J.
6-24-66-3
Ghibaudo A.
Tomic B.[4]
6-16-3
Langmo C.
Rybakov A.[8]
7-666-3
Dostanic S.
Kuhar M.
6-16-2
Jones B.
Shah A.
4-66-36-4
Smith C.[2]
Kingsley C.
3-67-666-4
Sheehy J.
Poling K.
7-617-64
Boyer T.[3]
Johns G.
6-46-4
Smith K.
Zink T.
6-36-757-63