Lucio Ratti vs Wilson Leite — Rosario CH Qualifying Round 1

Rosario CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
ARG9
Lucio Ratti
#372ATP
1374ELO
1350Clay ELO
22 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 February 2026
clay
BRA
Wilson Leite
#750ATP
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
Ratti L.
6-3 6-1
Leite W.
Ratti L.
662
Leite W.
310

Lucio Ratti defeated Wilson Leite 6-3 6-1 in the Rosario CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ratti L.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Leite W.

Leite W.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Ratti L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ratti L.Leite W.
1st serve in·Slight edge
69%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
60%
58%
Return points won·Even
41%
42%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.2
1.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (15 vs 11). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ratti L.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Leite W.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
4.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ratti L.Leite W.
Freshness·
—
100

Leite W.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Q2
La Serna J.[4]
Fernandez B.
6-27-5
Casanova H.[1]
De La Fuente S.[11]
3-66-26-4
Justo G.[2]
Monferrer E.
6-14-66-2
Ribeiro Marcondes I.[3]
Aboian V.[7]
6-36-2
Ambrogi L.[5]
Ratti L.[9]
7-56-4
Estevez J.[6]
Zarate C.[10]
6-16-3
Q1
Monferrer E.
Huertas Del Pino C.[12]
2-66-17-66
Estevez J.[6]
Garay V.
6-16-1
Casanova H.[1]
Falabella L.
6-30-66-2
De La Fuente S.[11]
Pagani D.
7-662-66-2
Justo G.[2]
Farjat T.
6-766-26-1
Ribeiro Marcondes I.[3]
Bieldiugin T.
6-36-1
Aboian V.[7]
Zeitune M.
1-66-46-4
La Serna J.[4]
Del Pino M.
6-47-5
Fernandez B.
Saraiva Dos Santos P.[8]
6-34-67-67
Ambrogi L.[5]
Bruna N.
6-16-2
Ratti L.[9]
Leite W.
6-36-1