Christian Langmo vs Alex Rybakov — Cleveland CH Round of 32

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Christian Langmo
USA
Christian Langmo
#467ATP
1267ELO
1254Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWLWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 February 2026
hard
Alex Rybakov
USA8
Alex Rybakov
#428ATP
1352ELO
1310Hard ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLL
Langmo C.
7-6 6-3
Rybakov A.
Langmo C.
7862
Rybakov A.
6630

Christian Langmo defeated Alex Rybakov 7-6 6-3 in the Cleveland CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Alex Rybakov came in ranked #428, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Langmo C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Rybakov A.

Rybakov A.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Serve advantage — Langmo C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Langmo C.Rybakov A.
1st serve in·Even
65%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Clear edge
69%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.3
3.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (29 vs 15). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Langmo C.Rybakov A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
23
15
Break points saved·Even
88
84
Break points won·Even
1
5
Deciding sets·Even
22
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
39
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Langmo C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Rybakov A.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.3Hard Elo 1254
Surface ELO
5.7+56 Hard Elo edge
3.9Overall Elo 1267
ELO gap
6.1Overall Elo 1352
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
3.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
8.9
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Langmo C.Rybakov A.
Freshness·Even
86
86

Langmo C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d) · Rybakov A.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Smith C.[2]
Gojo B.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Gojo B.
Sheehy J.
6-37-68
Smith C.[2]
Smith K.
7-646-1
Quarter-finals
Gojo B.
Vandecasteele Q.
6-46-4
Smith K.
Kozlov S.[7]
6-36-2
Smith C.[2]
Dostanic S.
6-47-64
Sheehy J.
Milavsky D.
7-646-707-66
R16
Smith K.
Ghibaudo A.
7-647-5
Dostanic S.
Langmo C.
6-36-786-4
Smith C.[2]
Jones B.
6-17-5
Milavsky D.
Martin D.
7-616-3
Sheehy J.
Martin A.[6]
7-636-3
Gojo B.
Boyer T.[3]
6-46-2
Kozlov S.[7]
Perot R.
7-653-66-3
Vandecasteele Q.
Boulais J.
6-26-4
R32
Kozlov S.[7]
Stebe C.
3-66-26-3
Martin D.
Shimabukuro S.[1]
6-36-4
Milavsky D.
Bigun K.
6-46-3
Martin A.[6]
Ilagan A.
7-673-67-5
Gojo B.
Kennedy J.
6-06-0
Boulais J.
Battle L.
6-36-4
Vandecasteele Q.
Cassone M.[5]
7-626-3
Perot R.
Friend J.
6-24-66-3
Ghibaudo A.
Tomic B.[4]
6-16-3
Langmo C.
Rybakov A.[8]
7-666-3
Dostanic S.
Kuhar M.
6-16-2
Jones B.
Shah A.
4-66-36-4
Smith C.[2]
Kingsley C.
3-67-666-4
Sheehy J.
Poling K.
7-617-64
Boyer T.[3]
Johns G.
6-46-4
Smith K.
Zink T.
6-36-757-63