Christoph Negritu vs Michael Geerts — Koblenz CH Round of 32

Koblenz CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Christoph Negritu
GER
Christoph Negritu
#489ATP
1459ELO
1423Hard ELO
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 February 2026
hard
Michael Geerts
BEL8
Michael Geerts
#333ATP
1400ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLWL
Negritu C.
2-6 6-3 7-6
Geerts M.
Negritu C.
26772
Geerts M.
63611

Christoph Negritu defeated Michael Geerts 2-6 6-3 7-6 in the Koblenz CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Michael Geerts came in ranked #333, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Negritu C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Geerts M.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Negritu C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Negritu C.Geerts M.
1st serve in·Even
58%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
54%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
35%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.9
4.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.5
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (18 vs 18). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Negritu C.Geerts M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
16
9
Break points saved·Even
78
82
Break points won·Even
0
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
26
8
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
21
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Negritu C.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Geerts M.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5+41 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Hard Elo 1383
5.6Overall Elo 1459
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1400
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.3
Surface form
3.7
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
6.7
4.0
3-set count
4.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kotov P.
Gentzsch T.[7]
6-41-67-68
Semi-finals
Kotov P.
Schoenhaus M.
6-46-0
Gentzsch T.[7]
Negritu C.
7-637-63
Quarter-finals
Kotov P.
Rehberg M.
6-26-4
Schoenhaus M.
Uchida K.[4]
7-56-766-2
Gentzsch T.[7]
Broska F.
6-776-26-2
Negritu C.
Added D.[2]
6-757-56-4
R16
Uchida K.[4]
Wiskandt M.
7-647-65
Negritu C.
Colson T.
7-667-64
Rehberg M.
Gadamauri B.
6-05-77-62
Schoenhaus M.
Zahraj P.[6]
6-36-4
Gentzsch T.[7]
Krumich M.
6-36-4
Added D.[2]
Molleker R.
6-46-737-65
Broska F.
Forejtek J.
6-756-36-4
Kotov P.
Kolar Z.[1]
6-46-3
R32
Zahraj P.[6]
Rosenkranz M.
3-65-5
Wiskandt M.
Mcdonald N.
7-52-66-3
Schoenhaus M.
Petkovic M.
5-77-56-3
Gentzsch T.[7]
Dedura Palomero D.
6-35-76-4
Krumich M.
Donald M.
6-47-5
Forejtek J.
Ursu V.
6-26-1
Colson T.
Malige M.
7-622-66-4
Added D.[2]
Masur D.
4-66-26-4
Broska F.
Monday J.[3]
6-31-0
Gadamauri B.
Squire H.[5]
2-66-16-3
Negritu C.
Geerts M.[8]
2-66-37-61
Rehberg M.
Gavrielides L.
6-36-2
Kolar Z.[1]
Sanchez Jover C.
6-26-3
Kotov P.
Barroso Campos A.
6-26-2
Uchida K.[4]
Nikles J.
6-46-1
Molleker R.
Moeller M.
2-67-56-3