Stefan Dostanic vs Matt Kuhar — Cleveland CH Round of 32

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Stefan Dostanic
#275ATP
1485ELO
1492Hard ELO
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 February 2026
hard
USA
Matt Kuhar
#757ATP
30 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWWWLW
Dostanic S.
6-1 6-2
Kuhar M.
Dostanic S.
662
Kuhar M.
120

Stefan Dostanic defeated Matt Kuhar 6-1 6-2 in the Cleveland CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Stefan Dostanic came in ranked #275, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Dostanic S.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kuhar M.

Kuhar M.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Dostanic S.

Serve advantage — Dostanic S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Dostanic S.Kuhar M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
46%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
42%
41%
Break points saved·Even
57%
58%
Aces / match·Even
3.7
3.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (36 vs 9). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Dostanic S.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kuhar M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
4.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
9.2
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Smith C.[2]
Gojo B.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Gojo B.
Sheehy J.
6-37-68
Smith C.[2]
Smith K.
7-646-1
Quarter-finals
Gojo B.
Vandecasteele Q.
6-46-4
Smith K.
Kozlov S.[7]
6-36-2
Smith C.[2]
Dostanic S.
6-47-64
Sheehy J.
Milavsky D.
7-646-707-66
R16
Smith K.
Ghibaudo A.
7-647-5
Dostanic S.
Langmo C.
6-36-786-4
Smith C.[2]
Jones B.
6-17-5
Milavsky D.
Martin D.
7-616-3
Sheehy J.
Martin A.[6]
7-636-3
Gojo B.
Boyer T.[3]
6-46-2
Kozlov S.[7]
Perot R.
7-653-66-3
Vandecasteele Q.
Boulais J.
6-26-4
R32
Kozlov S.[7]
Stebe C.
3-66-26-3
Martin D.
Shimabukuro S.[1]
6-36-4
Milavsky D.
Bigun K.
6-46-3
Martin A.[6]
Ilagan A.
7-673-67-5
Gojo B.
Kennedy J.
6-06-0
Boulais J.
Battle L.
6-36-4
Vandecasteele Q.
Cassone M.[5]
7-626-3
Perot R.
Friend J.
6-24-66-3
Ghibaudo A.
Tomic B.[4]
6-16-3
Langmo C.
Rybakov A.[8]
7-666-3
Dostanic S.
Kuhar M.
6-16-2
Jones B.
Shah A.
4-66-36-4
Smith C.[2]
Kingsley C.
3-67-666-4
Sheehy J.
Poling K.
7-617-64
Boyer T.[3]
Johns G.
6-46-4
Smith K.
Zink T.
6-36-757-63