Martin Damm vs Luca Nardi — Montpellier Quarter-final

Montpellier · ATP · Quarter-final
Martin Damm
USA
Martin Damm
#106ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 February 2026
hard
ITA
Luca Nardi
#166ATP
1585ELO
1572Hard ELO
$213kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
Damm M.
6-3 7-6
Nardi L.
Damm M.
67102
Nardi L.
3680

Martin Damm defeated Luca Nardi 6-3 7-6 in the Montpellier quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #106.

Key context

  • Match story: Martin Damm closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Damm M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Nardi L.

Nardi L.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Damm M.Nardi L.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
78%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
69%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
32%
40%
Break points saved·Even
63%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
12.2
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.9
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (33 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Damm M.Nardi L.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
26
32
Break points saved·Even
93
92
Break points won·Clear edge
1
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
5
42
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
18

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Damm M.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Nardi L.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.7+85 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.3Hard Elo 1572
5.8Overall Elo 1706
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1585
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
8.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.9
Minutes 14d
3.0
0.0
3-set count
0.0
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Damm M.Nardi L.
Freshness·Slight edge
91
86

Damm M.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Nardi L.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
13°CDrizzle
Wind 24 km/hHumidity 82%
Final
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Mannarino A.
6-37-64
Semi-finals
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Droguet T.
6-46-756-1
Mannarino A.
Damm M.
1-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Droguet T.
Griekspoor T.[4]
7-657-61
Damm M.
Nardi L.
6-37-68
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Fils A.[6]
6-46-2
Mannarino A.
Gea A.
5-76-46-4
R16
Gea A.
Machac T.[3]
6-34-5
Fils A.[6]
Blanchet U.
7-647-5
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Wawrinka S.
6-47-63
Damm M.
Bautista Agut R.
6-16-3
Mannarino A.
Humbert U.[5]
6-746-37-64
Droguet T.
Kovacevic A.[8]
4-67-656-4
Griekspoor T.[4]
Carreno Busta P.
6-46-4
Nardi L.
Cobolli F.[2]
6-26-3
R32
Gea A.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-30-0
Wawrinka S.
Medjedovic H.
7-636-4
Droguet T.
Choinski J.
6-27-62
Nardi L.
Basilashvili N.
6-36-3
Humbert U.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-36-4
Damm M.
Hurkacz H.[7]
7-656-4
Mannarino A.
Martinez P.
7-636-1
Kovacevic A.[8]
Kouame M.
6-756-26-2
Blanchet U.
Vavassori A.
6-46-3
Fils A.[6]
Royer V.
7-676-746-2
Bautista Agut R.
Oconnell C.
5-76-37-5
Carreno Busta P.
Kecmanovic M.
4-66-37-64