Filippo Romano vs Charles Broom — Cesenatico CH Round of 16

Cesenatico CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ITA
Filippo Romano
#308ATP
1470ELO
1489Hard ELO
21 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 February 2026
hard
GBR5
Charles Broom
#283ATP
1409ELO
1396Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWLL
Romano F.
7-5 6-3
Broom C.
Romano F.
762
Broom C.
530

Filippo Romano defeated Charles Broom 7-5 6-3 in the Cesenatico CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Romano F.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Broom C.serving91% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Romano F.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Romano F.Broom C.
1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
77%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
55%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
69%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
70%
68%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.7
8.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
1.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (26 vs 17). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Romano F.
3.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 126 days (−1.5)
Broom C.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.9+93 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.1Hard Elo 1396
5.3Overall Elo 1470
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1409
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.8
Surface form
7.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Romano F.Broom C.
Freshness·
88
—

Romano F.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Prihodko O.
Brancaccio R.
6-786-46-4
Semi-finals
Brancaccio R.
Romano F.
6-46-3
Prihodko O.
Gakhov I.[4]
6-37-66
Quarter-finals
Prihodko O.
Iannaccone F.
6-07-63
Gakhov I.[4]
Brunclik P.[7]
6-47-63
Brancaccio R.
Fellin P.
6-16-3
Romano F.
Dalla Valle E.
7-646-3
R16
Prihodko O.
Rottoli L.
6-26-0
Iannaccone F.
Feldbausch K.[8]
6-36-4
Brunclik P.[7]
Visker N.
6-47-63
Gakhov I.[4]
Forti F.
7-644-67-64
Romano F.
Broom C.[5]
7-56-3
Dalla Valle E.
Vandermeersch C.
6-46-4
Fellin P.
Gulin S.
6-27-65
Brancaccio R.
Lokoli L.
6-46-3
R32
Lokoli L.
Caniato C.
7-677-64
Gulin S.
Fonio G.
6-46-4
Iannaccone F.
Mecarelli M.
3-66-33-0
Gakhov I.[4]
Arnaboldi F.
5-77-57-5
Feldbausch K.[8]
Simundza J.
7-56-1
Brancaccio R.
Hemery C.[3]
6-47-64
Broom C.[5]
Napolitano S.
7-56-4
Romano F.
Martinez A.
7-656-4
Vandermeersch C.
Albot R.
6-37-5
Visker N.
Guerrieri A.
6-37-66
Rottoli L.
Angelini L.
6-44-66-4
Prihodko O.
Bondioli F.
6-44-66-4
Forti F.
Basile P.
6-46-3
Brunclik P.[7]
Ferrari G.
6-36-4
Fellin P.
Kopp S.[6]
6-36-1
Dalla Valle E.
Bertola R.[2]
4-67-686-2