Daniel Milavsky vs Kaylan Bigun — Cleveland CH Round of 32

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Daniel Milavsky
#335ATP
1349ELO
1337Hard ELO
24 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 February 2026
hard
USA
Kaylan Bigun
#531ATP
1302ELO
1275Hard ELO
20 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLWL
Milavsky D.
6-4 6-3
Bigun K.
Milavsky D.
662
Bigun K.
430

Daniel Milavsky defeated Kaylan Bigun 6-4 6-3 in the Cleveland CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Milavsky D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Bigun K.

Bigun K.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Milavsky D.

Serve advantage — Milavsky D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Milavsky D.Bigun K.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
72%
60%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
54%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
40%
Break points saved·Clear edge
73%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.9
3.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.8
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (12 vs 6). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Milavsky D.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Bigun K.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.0+62 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Hard Elo 1275
5.7Overall Elo 1349
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1302
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
1.2
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
8.6
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Milavsky D.Bigun K.
Freshness·Slight edge
68
76

Milavsky D.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 76 games (7d) · Bigun K.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 31 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Smith C.[2]
Gojo B.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Gojo B.
Sheehy J.
6-37-68
Smith C.[2]
Smith K.
7-646-1
Quarter-finals
Gojo B.
Vandecasteele Q.
6-46-4
Smith K.
Kozlov S.[7]
6-36-2
Smith C.[2]
Dostanic S.
6-47-64
Sheehy J.
Milavsky D.
7-646-707-66
R16
Smith K.
Ghibaudo A.
7-647-5
Dostanic S.
Langmo C.
6-36-786-4
Smith C.[2]
Jones B.
6-17-5
Milavsky D.
Martin D.
7-616-3
Sheehy J.
Martin A.[6]
7-636-3
Gojo B.
Boyer T.[3]
6-46-2
Kozlov S.[7]
Perot R.
7-653-66-3
Vandecasteele Q.
Boulais J.
6-26-4
R32
Kozlov S.[7]
Stebe C.
3-66-26-3
Martin D.
Shimabukuro S.[1]
6-36-4
Milavsky D.
Bigun K.
6-46-3
Martin A.[6]
Ilagan A.
7-673-67-5
Gojo B.
Kennedy J.
6-06-0
Boulais J.
Battle L.
6-36-4
Vandecasteele Q.
Cassone M.[5]
7-626-3
Perot R.
Friend J.
6-24-66-3
Ghibaudo A.
Tomic B.[4]
6-16-3
Langmo C.
Rybakov A.[8]
7-666-3
Dostanic S.
Kuhar M.
6-16-2
Jones B.
Shah A.
4-66-36-4
Smith C.[2]
Kingsley C.
3-67-666-4
Sheehy J.
Poling K.
7-617-64
Boyer T.[3]
Johns G.
6-46-4
Smith K.
Zink T.
6-36-757-63