Chun Hsin Tseng vs Valerio Aboian — Rosario CH Quarter-final

Rosario CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE6
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1541Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 February 2026
clay
ARG
Valerio Aboian
#427ATP
1348ELO
1339Clay ELO
24 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWLW
Tseng C.
6-2 6-1
Aboian V.
Tseng C.
662
Aboian V.
210

Chun Hsin Tseng defeated Valerio Aboian 6-2 6-1 in the Rosario CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Chun Hsin Tseng came in ranked #234, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tseng C.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Aboian V.

Aboian V.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tseng C.Aboian V.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
46%
Service points won·Even
60%
58%
Return points won·Even
40%
42%
Break points saved·Even
57%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.8
4.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.7
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (29 vs 27). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tseng C.Aboian V.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
12
Break points saved·Dominant
83
39
Break points won·Clear edge
15
37
Deciding sets·Clear edge
31
18
Tiebreaks·
23
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tseng C.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Aboian V.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.7+202 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.3Clay Elo 1339
7.6Overall Elo 1554
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1348
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
6.6
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tseng C.Aboian V.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
86

Tseng C.: 21 days rest · Aboian V.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 37 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Ugo Carabelli C.[1]
Burruchaga R.[5]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Ugo Carabelli C.[1]
Cerundolo J.[4]
7-56-1
Burruchaga R.[5]
Tseng C.[6]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Cerundolo J.[4]
Pellegrino A.[8]
6-46-3
Tseng C.[6]
Aboian V.
6-26-1
Burruchaga R.[5]
Boscardin Dias P.
7-636-3
Ugo Carabelli C.[1]
Dellien H.[7]
6-46-2
R16
Pellegrino A.[8]
Ambrogi L.
1-66-46-2
Tseng C.[6]
Mena F.
6-37-5
Ugo Carabelli C.[1]
Diaz Acosta F.
5-76-47-64
Dellien H.[7]
La Serna J.
6-36-2
Cerundolo J.[4]
Torres J.
3-66-46-3
Aboian V.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
7-56-4
Burruchaga R.[5]
Olivieri G.
6-36-1
Boscardin Dias P.
Comesana F.[2]
6-43-66-3
R32
Ugo Carabelli C.[1]
Justo G.
6-16-0
Diaz Acosta F.
Ribeiro Marcondes I.
7-636-0
La Serna J.
Olivo R.
6-42-66-3
Dellien H.[7]
Agamenone F.
6-26-3
Mena F.
Monteiro T.
7-57-63
Burruchaga R.[5]
Midon L.
6-16-1
Tseng C.[6]
Casanova H.
6-12-0
Torres J.
Barrena A.
6-36-1
Ambrogi L.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-47-64
Pellegrino A.[8]
Estevez J.
6-42-66-4
Olivieri G.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-36-1
Comesana F.[2]
Kicker N.
7-56-3
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Collarini A.
3-66-26-1
Boscardin Dias P.
Cecchinato M.
6-736-37-5
Aboian V.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-42-66-4
Cerundolo J.[4]
Villanueva G.
6-16-0