Coleman Wong vs Ryan Peniston — Manama CH Round of 32

Manama CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
HKG
Coleman Wong
#108ATP
1602ELO
1593Hard ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Tuesday, 27 January 2026
hard
Ryan Peniston
GBR
Ryan Peniston
#389ATP
1441ELO
1402Hard ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Wong C.
6-3 6-2
Peniston R.
Wong C.
662
Peniston R.
320

Coleman Wong defeated Ryan Peniston 6-3 6-2 in the Manama CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Coleman Wong came in ranked #108, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wong C.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Peniston R.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Serve advantage — Wong C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Wong C.Peniston R.
37
Serve
—
34
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wong C.Peniston R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
39%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
56%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Clear edge
65%
46%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.4
2.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
5.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (37 vs 4). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wong C.Peniston R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
43
20
Break points saved·Dominant
91
60
Break points won·Clear edge
5
25
Deciding sets·Slight edge
43
36
Tiebreaks·Dominant
88
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wong C.
7.8
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Peniston R.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.1+191 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.9Hard Elo 1402
8.1Overall Elo 1602
ELO gap
1.9Overall Elo 1441
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
6.8
Surface form
2.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Minutes 14d
8.0
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wong C.Peniston R.
Freshness·
100
—

Wong C.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Jacquet K.
Nardi L.[7]
7-53-66-4
Semi-finals
Nardi L.[7]
Virtanen O.
7-666-2
Jacquet K.
Bellucci M.[2]
6-796-47-66
Quarter-finals
Nardi L.[7]
Blanchet U.
6-46-4
Jacquet K.
Fearnley J.[3]
7-641-66-3
Bellucci M.[2]
Tirante T.[6]
6-46-4
Virtanen O.
Travaglia S.
6-47-5
R16
Travaglia S.
Wong C.
6-746-36-4
Blanchet U.
Grenier H.
7-656-4
Nardi L.[7]
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-36-0
Jacquet K.
Hanfmann Y.[5]
6-37-63
Tirante T.[6]
Schwaerzler J.
3-66-26-3
Virtanen O.
Giustino L.
7-646-3
Fearnley J.[3]
Pokorny L.
3-66-46-1
Bellucci M.[2]
Butvilas E.
6-47-5
R32
Nardi L.[7]
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-657-61
Giustino L.
Misolic F.[4]
7-657-64
Blanchet U.
Popyrin A.[1]
6-37-66
Grenier H.
Zhukayev B.
6-756-26-1
Budkov Kjaer N.
Kuzmanov D.
5-76-17-5
Fearnley J.[3]
Neumayer L.
6-37-64
Tirante T.[6]
Blancaneaux G.
6-36-3
Schwaerzler J.
Ursu V.
7-656-4
Butvilas E.
Mrva M.
6-26-2
Bellucci M.[2]
Erel Y.
6-46-4
Virtanen O.
Zhang Z.
4-67-6127-65
Wong C.
Peniston R.
6-36-2
Hanfmann Y.[5]
Dhamne M.
6-36-2
Jacquet K.
Oconnell C.
6-36-1
Travaglia S.
Mochizuki S.[8]
6-37-61
Pokorny L.
Den Ouden G.
6-47-5