Luca Nardi vs Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez — Manama CH Round of 32

Manama CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA7
Luca Nardi
#166ATP
1585ELO
1572Hard ELO
$213kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Tuesday, 27 January 2026
hard
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
MEX
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
#338ATP
1527ELO
1487Hard ELO
21 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWW
Nardi L.
7-6 7-6
Pacheco Mendez R.
Nardi L.
77772
Pacheco Mendez R.
65610

Luca Nardi defeated Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez 7-6 7-6 in the Manama CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nardi L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Pacheco Mendez R.

Pacheco Mendez R.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Nardi L.

Serve advantage — Pacheco Mendez R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nardi L.Pacheco Mendez R.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
67%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.2
5.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 23). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nardi L.Pacheco Mendez R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
33
13
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
81
Break points won·Clear edge
15
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
42
21
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
20
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nardi L.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Pacheco Mendez R.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.3+85 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.7Hard Elo 1487
6.2Overall Elo 1585
ELO gap
3.8Overall Elo 1527
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.7
Surface form
5.0
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
6.5
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nardi L.Pacheco Mendez R.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
78

Nardi L.: 17 days rest · Pacheco Mendez R.: 4 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Jacquet K.
Nardi L.[7]
7-53-66-4
Semi-finals
Nardi L.[7]
Virtanen O.
7-666-2
Jacquet K.
Bellucci M.[2]
6-796-47-66
Quarter-finals
Nardi L.[7]
Blanchet U.
6-46-4
Jacquet K.
Fearnley J.[3]
7-641-66-3
Bellucci M.[2]
Tirante T.[6]
6-46-4
Virtanen O.
Travaglia S.
6-47-5
R16
Travaglia S.
Wong C.
6-746-36-4
Blanchet U.
Grenier H.
7-656-4
Nardi L.[7]
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-36-0
Jacquet K.
Hanfmann Y.[5]
6-37-63
Tirante T.[6]
Schwaerzler J.
3-66-26-3
Virtanen O.
Giustino L.
7-646-3
Fearnley J.[3]
Pokorny L.
3-66-46-1
Bellucci M.[2]
Butvilas E.
6-47-5
R32
Nardi L.[7]
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-657-61
Giustino L.
Misolic F.[4]
7-657-64
Blanchet U.
Popyrin A.[1]
6-37-66
Grenier H.
Zhukayev B.
6-756-26-1
Budkov Kjaer N.
Kuzmanov D.
5-76-17-5
Fearnley J.[3]
Neumayer L.
6-37-64
Tirante T.[6]
Blancaneaux G.
6-36-3
Schwaerzler J.
Ursu V.
7-656-4
Butvilas E.
Mrva M.
6-26-2
Bellucci M.[2]
Erel Y.
6-46-4
Virtanen O.
Zhang Z.
4-67-6127-65
Wong C.
Peniston R.
6-36-2
Hanfmann Y.[5]
Dhamne M.
6-36-2
Jacquet K.
Oconnell C.
6-36-1
Travaglia S.
Mochizuki S.[8]
6-37-61
Pokorny L.
Den Ouden G.
6-47-5