Karl Poling vs Keenan Mayo — San Diego CH Qualifying Round 1

San Diego CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
USA5
Karl Poling
#506ATP
1314ELO
1320Hard ELO
26 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Tuesday, 27 January 2026
hard
USA
Keenan Mayo
#1207ATP
26 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Poling K.
6-3 6-2
Mayo K.
Poling K.
662
Mayo K.
320

Karl Poling defeated Keenan Mayo 6-3 6-2 in the San Diego CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Poling K.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Mayo K.

Mayo K.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Poling K.

Serve advantage — Poling K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Poling K.Mayo K.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
30%
Break points saved·Clear edge
61%
40%
Aces / match·Even
1.7
2.0
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (21 vs 2). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Poling K.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 64 days (−1.2)
Mayo K.
3.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 183 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 14
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Poling K.Mayo K.
Freshness·
98
—

Poling K.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Artnak B.[1]
Sheehy J.[9]
0-66-37-65
Zhu E.[11]
Zamora N.
7-57-5
Corwin F.[8]
Kingsley C.[3]
6-46-4
Lechno Wasiutynski F.
Johnson S.
7-51-67-5
Dostanic S.[4]
Seggerman R.
6-06-4
Poling K.[5]
Vandecasteele Q.[7]
7-636-4
Q1
Sheehy J.[9]
Magadan A.
6-36-2
Zamora N.
Van Loben Sels E.
3-66-46-4
Johnson S.
Ayeni O.[6]
3-67-656-4
Artnak B.[1]
Jones B.
7-641-66-3
Kingsley C.[3]
Hilderbrand T.
7-656-4
Corwin F.[8]
Schachter N.
1-66-46-0
Dostanic S.[4]
Seelig K.
6-36-4
Seggerman R.
Kuhar M.[12]
7-636-3
Poling K.[5]
Mayo K.
6-36-2
Vandecasteele Q.[7]
Kumar P.
6-16-2
Zhu E.[11]
Inchauspe P.
7-604-66-3
Lechno Wasiutynski F.
Bigun K.[10]
6-756-36-4