Colton Smith vs Christian Langmo — San Diego CH Round of 32

San Diego CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA7
Colton Smith
#186ATP
1577ELO
1566Hard ELO
$154kYTD
$480kCAREER
23 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Tuesday, 27 January 2026
hard
Christian Langmo
USA
Christian Langmo
#464ATP
1267ELO
1254Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
Smith C.
6-3 6-3
Langmo C.
Smith C.
662
Langmo C.
330

Colton Smith defeated Christian Langmo 6-3 6-3 in the San Diego CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Colton Smith came in ranked #186, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Smith C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Langmo C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Smith C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Smith C.Langmo C.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
70%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
6.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (26 vs 29). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Smith C.Langmo C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
62
22
Break points saved·Slight edge
94
88
Break points won·Dominant
52
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
22
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
34

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Smith C.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Langmo C.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.0+312 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.0Hard Elo 1254
7.8Overall Elo 1577
ELO gap
2.2Overall Elo 1267
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
3.0
Surface form
7.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Smith C.Langmo C.
Freshness·Even
100
98

Smith C.: 17 days rest · Langmo C.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Svajda Z.[4]
Korda S.[1]
6-47-65
Semi-finals
Svajda Z.[4]
Shimabukuro S.[5]
6-46-1
Korda S.[1]
Kypson P.[3]
7-646-2
Quarter-finals
Korda S.[1]
Draxl L.[6]
7-646-4
Kypson P.[3]
Smith C.[7]
7-656-0
Svajda Z.[4]
Krueger M.
6-32-66-2
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Hijikata R.[2]
6-46-4
R16
Korda S.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-24-66-3
Draxl L.[6]
Svajda T.
6-36-4
Kypson P.[3]
Johns G.
7-646-2
Smith C.[7]
Bicknell B.
5-77-636-1
Svajda Z.[4]
Smith K.
7-626-4
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Fenty A.
6-41-67-62
Hijikata R.[2]
Tomic B.
3-66-46-3
Krueger M.
Samuel T.
6-46-4
R32
Johns G.
Poling K.
6-27-65
Bicknell B.
Rybakov A.
6-47-5
Smith C.[7]
Langmo C.
6-36-3
Korda S.[1]
Milavsky D.
6-47-5
Ilagan A.
Lechno Wasiutynski F.
6-17-5
Svajda T.
Braswell M.
6-26-2
Draxl L.[6]
Cassone M.
6-26-2
Kypson P.[3]
Zink T.
7-656-1
Samuel T.
Boyer T.[8]
6-35-76-4
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Kozlov S.
6-24-67-65
Krueger M.
Stebe C.
6-16-1
Smith K.
Perot R.
6-37-66
Svajda Z.[4]
Zhu E.
6-26-4
Fenty A.
Artnak B.
6-27-5
Tomic B.
Corwin F.
7-666-3
Hijikata R.[2]
Dostanic S.
2-66-36-2