Matias Soto vs Nicolas Kicker — Concepcion CH Round of 32

Concepcion CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CHI
Matias Soto
#249ATP
1421ELO
1412Clay ELO
27 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Tuesday, 27 January 2026
clay
Nicolas Kicker
ARG
Nicolas Kicker
#322ATP
1385ELO
1373Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
Soto M.
2-6 6-4 7-6
Kicker N.
Soto M.
26772
Kicker N.
64631

Matias Soto defeated Nicolas Kicker 2-6 6-4 7-6 in the Concepcion CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Matias Soto came in ranked #249, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Soto M.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Kicker N.

Kicker N.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Soto M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Soto M.Kicker N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
43%
Service points won·Even
62%
58%
Return points won·Even
41%
42%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.7
1.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.8
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (18 vs 17). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Soto M.Kicker N.
Clutch Rating·Even
34
30
Break points saved·Slight edge
51
56
Break points won·Dominant
14
45
Deciding sets·Dominant
68
30
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
56
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Soto M.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 85 days (−1.2)
Kicker N.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.6+39 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Clay Elo 1373
6.5Overall Elo 1421
ELO gap
3.5Overall Elo 1385
4.6No prior meetings
H2H
5.4
4.9
Surface form
3.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
8.5
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Soto M.Kicker N.
Freshness·Dominant
56
100

Soto M.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 120 games (7d) · Kicker N.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Vallejo A.[6]
Tabilo A.[1]
6-21-66-1
Semi-finals
Vallejo A.[6]
Barrios Vera T.[2]
6-31-66-4
Tabilo A.[1]
Cecchinato M.
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Cecchinato M.
Tseng C.[3]
6-26-2
Vallejo A.[6]
Reis Da Silva J.
3-66-36-1
Barrios Vera T.[2]
Justo G.
6-34-66-4
Tabilo A.[1]
Midon L.
5-76-16-2
R16
Tseng C.[3]
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-56-4
Cecchinato M.
Guillen Meza A.[8]
7-56-1
Vallejo A.[6]
Varillas J.
6-46-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Lajovic D.[4]
6-32-66-1
Barrios Vera T.[2]
Monteiro T.
6-27-5
Tabilo A.[1]
Soto M.
6-26-3
Midon L.
Barrena A.[7]
6-27-5
Justo G.
Torres J.
6-36-2
R32
Guillen Meza A.[8]
Collarini A.
6-24-66-3
Tseng C.[3]
Olivieri G.
7-646-1
Torres J.
Dellien H.[5]
0-66-46-1
Tabilo A.[1]
Villanueva G.
7-56-4
Soto M.
Kicker N.
2-66-47-63
Midon L.
Villalon N.
6-32-66-4
Cecchinato M.
Ribeiro Marcondes I.
6-06-3
Vallejo A.[6]
Boscardin Dias P.
6-26-4
Varillas J.
Meligeni Alves F.
7-56-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-46-2
Lajovic D.[4]
Mena F.
6-26-1
Justo G.
Torrealba B.
6-27-64
Monteiro T.
Diaz Acosta F.
6-46-4
Barrios Vera T.[2]
Bueno G.
3-66-26-4
Dutra Da Silva D.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-36-1
Barrena A.[7]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
1-67-656-4