Patrick Kypson vs Garrett Johns — San Diego CH Round of 16

San Diego CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Patrick Kypson
USA3
Patrick Kypson
#113ATP
1641ELO
1611Hard ELO
$260kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Tuesday, 27 January 2026
hard
Garrett Johns
USA
Garrett Johns
#382ATP
1336ELO
1323Hard ELO
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
Kypson P.
7-6 6-2
Johns G.
Kypson P.
7762
Johns G.
6420

Patrick Kypson defeated Garrett Johns 7-6 6-2 in the San Diego CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Patrick Kypson came in ranked #113.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kypson P.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Johns G.

Johns G.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kypson P.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kypson P.Johns G.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.1
2.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (26 vs 25). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kypson P.Johns G.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
42
36
Break points saved·Dominant
93
66
Break points won·Dominant
41
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
17
90
Tiebreaks·Dominant
76
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kypson P.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Johns G.
3.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 64 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
8.5+288 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.5Hard Elo 1323
8.6Overall Elo 1641
ELO gap
1.4Overall Elo 1336
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.7
Surface form
3.7
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kypson P.Johns G.
Freshness·Dominant
90
57

Kypson P.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Johns G.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 95 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Svajda Z.[4]
Korda S.[1]
6-47-65
Semi-finals
Svajda Z.[4]
Shimabukuro S.[5]
6-46-1
Korda S.[1]
Kypson P.[3]
7-646-2
Quarter-finals
Korda S.[1]
Draxl L.[6]
7-646-4
Kypson P.[3]
Smith C.[7]
7-656-0
Svajda Z.[4]
Krueger M.
6-32-66-2
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Hijikata R.[2]
6-46-4
R16
Korda S.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-24-66-3
Draxl L.[6]
Svajda T.
6-36-4
Kypson P.[3]
Johns G.
7-646-2
Smith C.[7]
Bicknell B.
5-77-636-1
Svajda Z.[4]
Smith K.
7-626-4
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Fenty A.
6-41-67-62
Hijikata R.[2]
Tomic B.
3-66-46-3
Krueger M.
Samuel T.
6-46-4
R32
Johns G.
Poling K.
6-27-65
Bicknell B.
Rybakov A.
6-47-5
Smith C.[7]
Langmo C.
6-36-3
Korda S.[1]
Milavsky D.
6-47-5
Ilagan A.
Lechno Wasiutynski F.
6-17-5
Svajda T.
Braswell M.
6-26-2
Draxl L.[6]
Cassone M.
6-26-2
Kypson P.[3]
Zink T.
7-656-1
Samuel T.
Boyer T.[8]
6-35-76-4
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Kozlov S.
6-24-67-65
Krueger M.
Stebe C.
6-16-1
Smith K.
Perot R.
6-37-66
Svajda Z.[4]
Zhu E.
6-26-4
Fenty A.
Artnak B.
6-27-5
Tomic B.
Corwin F.
7-666-3
Hijikata R.[2]
Dostanic S.
2-66-36-2