Sebastian Korda vs Liam Draxl — San Diego CH Quarter-final

San Diego CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Sebastian Korda
USA1
Sebastian Korda
#63ATP
1809ELO
1765Hard ELO
$471kYTD
$9.0MCAREER
26 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Tuesday, 27 January 2026
hard
Liam Draxl
CAN6
Liam Draxl
#223ATP
1592ELO
1565Hard ELO
$201kYTD
$642kCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
Korda S.
7-6 6-4
Draxl L.
Korda S.
7762
Draxl L.
6440

Sebastian Korda defeated Liam Draxl 7-6 6-4 in the San Diego CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Sebastian Korda came in ranked #63.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Korda S.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Draxl L.

Draxl L.serving75% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Korda S.

Serve advantage — Korda S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Korda S.Draxl L.
61
Serve
—
58
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Korda S.Draxl L.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
69%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.1
4.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 30). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Korda S.Draxl L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
87
66
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
83
Break points won·Dominant
73
36
Deciding sets·Even
96
94
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
94
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Korda S.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Draxl L.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.0+200 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.0Hard Elo 1565
9.1Overall Elo 1809
ELO gap
0.9Overall Elo 1592
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
7.1
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
4.4
7.0
3-set count
0.0
2.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Korda S.Draxl L.
Freshness·
—
98

Draxl L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Svajda Z.[4]
Korda S.[1]
6-47-65
Semi-finals
Svajda Z.[4]
Shimabukuro S.[5]
6-46-1
Korda S.[1]
Kypson P.[3]
7-646-2
Quarter-finals
Korda S.[1]
Draxl L.[6]
7-646-4
Kypson P.[3]
Smith C.[7]
7-656-0
Svajda Z.[4]
Krueger M.
6-32-66-2
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Hijikata R.[2]
6-46-4
R16
Korda S.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-24-66-3
Draxl L.[6]
Svajda T.
6-36-4
Kypson P.[3]
Johns G.
7-646-2
Smith C.[7]
Bicknell B.
5-77-636-1
Svajda Z.[4]
Smith K.
7-626-4
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Fenty A.
6-41-67-62
Hijikata R.[2]
Tomic B.
3-66-46-3
Krueger M.
Samuel T.
6-46-4
R32
Johns G.
Poling K.
6-27-65
Bicknell B.
Rybakov A.
6-47-5
Smith C.[7]
Langmo C.
6-36-3
Korda S.[1]
Milavsky D.
6-47-5
Ilagan A.
Lechno Wasiutynski F.
6-17-5
Svajda T.
Braswell M.
6-26-2
Draxl L.[6]
Cassone M.
6-26-2
Kypson P.[3]
Zink T.
7-656-1
Samuel T.
Boyer T.[8]
6-35-76-4
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Kozlov S.
6-24-67-65
Krueger M.
Stebe C.
6-16-1
Smith K.
Perot R.
6-37-66
Svajda Z.[4]
Zhu E.
6-26-4
Fenty A.
Artnak B.
6-27-5
Tomic B.
Corwin F.
7-666-3
Hijikata R.[2]
Dostanic S.
2-66-36-2