Roberto Carballes Baena vs Michael Geerts — Quimper CH Round of 32

Quimper CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Roberto Carballes Baena
ESP
Roberto Carballes Baena
#163ATP
1632ELO
1592Hard ELO
$188kYTD
$6.3MCAREER
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Tuesday, 27 January 2026
hard
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#333ATP
1400ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLWL
Carballes Baena R.
6-2 7-6
Geerts M.
Carballes Baena R.
6772
Geerts M.
2630

Roberto Carballes Baena defeated Michael Geerts 6-2 7-6 in the Quimper CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Carballes Baena R.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Geerts M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Carballes Baena R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Carballes Baena R.Geerts M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
54%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.9
5.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (25 vs 18). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Carballes Baena R.Geerts M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
61
9
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
82
Break points won·Dominant
58
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
64
8
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Carballes Baena R.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Geerts M.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.5+210 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.5Hard Elo 1383
7.7Overall Elo 1632
ELO gap
2.3Overall Elo 1400
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
5.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
7.7
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Carballes Baena R.Geerts M.
Freshness·
100
—

Carballes Baena R.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Van Assche L.
Bertola R.
3-66-17-5
Semi-finals
Van Assche L.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-45-77-61
Bertola R.
Huesler M.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Bertola R.
Mcdonald M.[8]
4-1
Van Assche L.
Droguet T.
6-46-4
Huesler M.
Faurel T.
6-36-2
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Bonzi B.[7]
6-26-737-5
R16
Droguet T.
Kovacevic A.[1]
7-647-68
Van Assche L.
Molcan A.
6-46-4
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Martinez P.[3]
7-656-1
Bonzi B.[7]
Harris B.
6-46-0
Faurel T.
Basilashvili N.[6]
6-36-4
Huesler M.
Engel J.
3-66-47-64
Mcdonald M.[8]
Carballes Baena R.
6-46-4
Bertola R.
Kotov P.
7-657-5
R32
Kovacevic A.[1]
Tabur C.
7-646-4
Droguet T.
Arnaboldi F.
7-56-4
Molcan A.
Added D.
6-46-3
Martinez P.[3]
Bouquier A.
6-47-5
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Lokoli L.
6-16-2
Harris B.
Martin D.
6-46-4
Bonzi B.[7]
Paire B.
6-46-3
Basilashvili N.[6]
Ghazouani Durand Y.
6-47-5
Faurel T.
Martineau M.
6-46-3
Huesler M.
Halys Q.[4]
6-37-69
Mcdonald M.[8]
Echargui M.
6-27-5
Carballes Baena R.
Geerts M.
6-27-63
Kotov P.
Lajal M.
3-66-46-4
Bertola R.
Mannarino A.[2]
7-656-4
Engel J.
Kasnikowski M.
6-36-2
Van Assche L.
Shevchenko A.[5]
6-46-4