Luca Van Assche vs Titouan Droguet — Quimper CH Quarter-final

Quimper CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Luca Van Assche
FRA
Luca Van Assche
#80ATP
1701ELO
1681Hard ELO
$411kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
22 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Tuesday, 27 January 2026
hard
Titouan Droguet
FRA
Titouan Droguet
#116ATP
1717ELO
1650Hard ELO
$273kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLLWWWL
Van Assche L.
6-4 6-4
Droguet T.
Van Assche L.
662
Droguet T.
440

Luca Van Assche defeated Titouan Droguet 6-4 6-4 in the Quimper CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Luca Van Assche came in ranked #80.

Key context

  • Match story: Luca Van Assche edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van Assche L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Droguet T.

Droguet T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Van Assche L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Van Assche L.Droguet T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
55%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
68%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
36%
Break points saved·Even
64%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.9
9.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (35 vs 31). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van Assche L.Droguet T.
Clutch Rating·Even
67
64
Break points saved·Even
91
88
Break points won·Dominant
61
17
Deciding sets·Clear edge
79
93
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
87

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van Assche L.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Droguet T.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+31 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Hard Elo 1650
4.9Overall Elo 1701
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1717
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.4
Surface form
5.6
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
8.5
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Van Assche L.Droguet T.
Freshness·Dominant
99
64

Van Assche L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Droguet T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 80 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Van Assche L.
Bertola R.
3-66-17-5
Semi-finals
Van Assche L.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-45-77-61
Bertola R.
Huesler M.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Bertola R.
Mcdonald M.[8]
4-1
Van Assche L.
Droguet T.
6-46-4
Huesler M.
Faurel T.
6-36-2
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Bonzi B.[7]
6-26-737-5
R16
Droguet T.
Kovacevic A.[1]
7-647-68
Van Assche L.
Molcan A.
6-46-4
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Martinez P.[3]
7-656-1
Bonzi B.[7]
Harris B.
6-46-0
Faurel T.
Basilashvili N.[6]
6-36-4
Huesler M.
Engel J.
3-66-47-64
Mcdonald M.[8]
Carballes Baena R.
6-46-4
Bertola R.
Kotov P.
7-657-5
R32
Kovacevic A.[1]
Tabur C.
7-646-4
Droguet T.
Arnaboldi F.
7-56-4
Molcan A.
Added D.
6-46-3
Martinez P.[3]
Bouquier A.
6-47-5
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Lokoli L.
6-16-2
Harris B.
Martin D.
6-46-4
Bonzi B.[7]
Paire B.
6-46-3
Basilashvili N.[6]
Ghazouani Durand Y.
6-47-5
Faurel T.
Martineau M.
6-46-3
Huesler M.
Halys Q.[4]
6-37-69
Mcdonald M.[8]
Echargui M.
6-27-5
Carballes Baena R.
Geerts M.
6-27-63
Kotov P.
Lajal M.
3-66-46-4
Bertola R.
Mannarino A.[2]
7-656-4
Engel J.
Kasnikowski M.
6-36-2
Van Assche L.
Shevchenko A.[5]
6-46-4