Pol Martin Tiffon vs Ha Minh Duc Vu — Phan Thiet 2 CH Round of 32

Phan Thiet 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ESP8
Pol Martin Tiffon
#208ATP
1561ELO
1545Hard ELO
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 January 2026
hard
VIE
Ha Minh Duc Vu
#1854ATP
23 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
L
Martin Tiffon P.
6-1 6-2
Vu H.
Martin Tiffon P.
662
Vu H.
120

Pol Martin Tiffon defeated Ha Minh Duc Vu 6-1 6-2 in the Phan Thiet 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Martin Tiffon P.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Vu H.

Vu H.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Martin Tiffon P.

Serve advantage — Martin Tiffon P.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season
Martin Tiffon P.Vu H.
1st serve in·Even
60%
56%
1st serve points won·Dominant
71%
35%
2nd serve points won·Dominant
53%
19%
Service points won·Dominant
63%
28%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
34%
Break points saved·Clear edge
62%
40%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.2
0.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (41 vs 1). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Martin Tiffon P.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Vu H.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
3.4
Minutes 14d
9.4
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Martin Tiffon P.Vu H.
Freshness·
94
—

Martin Tiffon P.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 10 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Simakin I.
Zhou Y.[6]
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Zhou Y.[6]
Michalski D.[7]
7-630-0
Simakin I.
Sakellaridis S.
3-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Michalski D.[7]
Bax F.
6-26-4
Simakin I.
Barsukov N.
7-627-5
Zhou Y.[6]
Hsu Y.[4]
7-646-3
Sakellaridis S.
Martin Tiffon P.[8]
6-26-3
R16
Bax F.
Gengel M.
6-21-0
Barsukov N.
Sin S.
6-16-3
Simakin I.
Bar Biryukov P.
4-66-46-2
Sakellaridis S.
Bailly G.[3]
6-36-2
Martin Tiffon P.[8]
Jones M.
6-26-2
Zhou Y.[6]
Denolly C.
6-17-62
Hsu Y.[4]
Blanch D.
6-03-66-3
Michalski D.[7]
Jasika O.
6-41-66-1
R32
Sin S.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-33-62-1
Bax F.
Sun F.
2-66-36-4
Barsukov N.
Gomez F.[1]
7-637-5
Bar Biryukov P.
Ribecai M.
6-46-2
Simakin I.
Cina F.[5]
6-33-66-3
Sakellaridis S.
Kwon S.
6-26-3
Martin Tiffon P.[8]
Vu H.
6-16-2
Zhou Y.[6]
Cui J.
6-37-64
Blanch D.
Ferguson C.
6-06-1
Hsu Y.[4]
Bertrand R.
7-57-65
Michalski D.[7]
Handel T.
7-56-1
Gengel M.
Crawford O.[2]
1-66-16-1
Jasika O.
Marmousez L.
3-4
Denolly C.
Chung H.
6-26-4
Jones M.
Sharipov M.
6-37-64
Bailly G.[3]
Matsuoka H.
6-16-3