Daniel Michalski vs Tim Handel — Phan Thiet 2 CH Round of 32
Phan Thiet 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 January 2026
hard
Umpiry Score
Pre-match6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limitedForm & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
7.4
Surface form3.2
0.0
Win streakFatigue & Travel
2.6
Minutes 14d7.3
0.0
3-set count0.0
9.0
Prev. match6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Michalski D.
762
Handel T.
510
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Statistics
Recent form59%1st serve in+3%62%
64%1st serve points won+4%68%
50%2nd serve points won+4%46%
59%Service points won+1%60%
41%Return points won+2%39%
50%Break points saved+4%54%
2.3Aces / match+1.94.2
1.8Double faults / match+23.8
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 19). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw
Quarter-finals
Simakin I.
Barsukov N.
7-627-5
Zhou Y.[6]
Hsu Y.[4]
7-646-3
Michalski D.[7]
Bax F.
6-26-4
Sakellaridis S.
Martin Tiffon P.[8]
6-26-3
R16
Barsukov N.
Sin S.
6-16-3
Simakin I.
Bar Biryukov P.
4-66-46-2
Sakellaridis S.
Bailly G.[3]
6-36-2
Martin Tiffon P.[8]
Jones M.
6-26-2
Zhou Y.[6]
Denolly C.
6-17-62
Hsu Y.[4]
Blanch D.
6-03-66-3
Bax F.
Gengel M.
6-21-0
Michalski D.[7]
Jasika O.
6-41-66-1
R32
Barsukov N.
Gomez F.[1]
7-637-5
Bar Biryukov P.
Ribecai M.
6-46-2
Simakin I.
Cina F.[5]
6-33-66-3
Sakellaridis S.
Kwon S.
6-26-3
Martin Tiffon P.[8]
Vu H.
6-16-2
Zhou Y.[6]
Cui J.
6-37-64
Denolly C.
Chung H.
6-26-4
Blanch D.
Ferguson C.
6-06-1
Hsu Y.[4]
Bertrand R.
7-57-65
Michalski D.[7]
Handel T.
7-56-1
Jasika O.
Marmousez L.
3-4
Gengel M.
Crawford O.[2]
1-66-16-1
Sin S.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-33-62-1
Jones M.
Sharipov M.
6-37-64
Bax F.
Sun F.
2-66-36-4
Bailly G.[3]
Matsuoka H.
6-16-3