Daniel Michalski vs Tim Handel — Phan Thiet 2 CH Round of 32

Phan Thiet 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Daniel Michalski
POL7
Daniel Michalski
#302ATP
1435ELO
1426Hard ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 January 2026
hard
GER
Tim Handel
#785ATP
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLLW
Michalski D.
7-5 6-1
Handel T.
Michalski D.
762
Handel T.
510

Daniel Michalski defeated Tim Handel 7-5 6-1 in the Phan Thiet 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Michalski came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Michalski D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Handel T.

Handel T.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Michalski D.

Serve advantage — Michalski D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Michalski D.Handel T.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
2nd serve points won·Clear edge
50%
35%
Service points won·Even
59%
55%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
51%
47%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.3
6.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.5
5.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (23 vs 4). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Michalski D.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Handel T.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.4
Surface form
3.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
2.6
Minutes 14d
7.3
0.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Michalski D.Handel T.
Freshness·
80
—

Michalski D.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 37 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Simakin I.
Zhou Y.[6]
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Zhou Y.[6]
Michalski D.[7]
7-630-0
Simakin I.
Sakellaridis S.
3-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Michalski D.[7]
Bax F.
6-26-4
Simakin I.
Barsukov N.
7-627-5
Zhou Y.[6]
Hsu Y.[4]
7-646-3
Sakellaridis S.
Martin Tiffon P.[8]
6-26-3
R16
Bax F.
Gengel M.
6-21-0
Barsukov N.
Sin S.
6-16-3
Simakin I.
Bar Biryukov P.
4-66-46-2
Sakellaridis S.
Bailly G.[3]
6-36-2
Martin Tiffon P.[8]
Jones M.
6-26-2
Zhou Y.[6]
Denolly C.
6-17-62
Hsu Y.[4]
Blanch D.
6-03-66-3
Michalski D.[7]
Jasika O.
6-41-66-1
R32
Sin S.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-33-62-1
Bax F.
Sun F.
2-66-36-4
Barsukov N.
Gomez F.[1]
7-637-5
Bar Biryukov P.
Ribecai M.
6-46-2
Simakin I.
Cina F.[5]
6-33-66-3
Sakellaridis S.
Kwon S.
6-26-3
Martin Tiffon P.[8]
Vu H.
6-16-2
Zhou Y.[6]
Cui J.
6-37-64
Blanch D.
Ferguson C.
6-06-1
Hsu Y.[4]
Bertrand R.
7-57-65
Michalski D.[7]
Handel T.
7-56-1
Gengel M.
Crawford O.[2]
1-66-16-1
Jasika O.
Marmousez L.
3-4
Denolly C.
Chung H.
6-26-4
Jones M.
Sharipov M.
6-37-64
Bailly G.[3]
Matsuoka H.
6-16-3