Vilius Gaubas vs Martin Damm — Oeiras 2 CH Round of 32

Oeiras 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
LTU2
Vilius Gaubas
#128ATP
1581ELO
1560Hard ELO
$275kYTD
$759kCAREER
21 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 January 2026
hard
Martin Damm
USA
Martin Damm
#104ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Gaubas V.
6-7 6-3 7-6
Damm M.
Gaubas V.
646772
Damm M.
773631

Vilius Gaubas defeated Martin Damm 6-7 6-3 7-6 in the Oeiras 2 CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #104.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gaubas V.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Damm M.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Gaubas V.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gaubas V.Damm M.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
66%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
69%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
32%
Break points saved·Even
65%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.3
12.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (30 vs 33). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gaubas V.Damm M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
26
Break points saved·Slight edge
87
93
Break points won·Dominant
52
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
86
5
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gaubas V.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Damm M.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.4Hard Elo 1560
Surface ELO
5.6+97 Hard Elo edge
4.6Overall Elo 1581
ELO gap
5.4Overall Elo 1706
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.0
Surface form
6.7
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
2.0
Minutes 14d
5.7
0.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gaubas V.Damm M.
Freshness·Slight edge
81
92

Gaubas V.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 48 games (7d) · Damm M.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Rodesch C.
Glinka D.
6-37-5
Semi-finals
Rodesch C.
Galarneau A.
6-46-4
Glinka D.
Ferreira Silva F.
4-67-56-4
Quarter-finals
Rodesch C.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-46-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Gakhov I.
6-36-4
Glinka D.
Llamas Ruiz P.
6-23-67-65
Galarneau A.
Faria J.[4]
7-57-64
R16
Rodesch C.
Torres T.
W/O
Montes De La Torre I.
Erhard M.
6-36-3
Llamas Ruiz P.
Moro Canas A.
7-56-1
Glinka D.
Kukushkin M.
6-36-4
Gakhov I.
Rosenkranz M.
6-47-62
Faria J.[4]
Dedura Palomero D.
6-37-5
Galarneau A.
Holmgren A.
6-44-67-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Gaubas V.[2]
5-77-647-5
R32
Glinka D.
Elias G.
6-26-4
Rodesch C.
Moller E.[1]
6-30-0
Faria J.[4]
Pereira T.
4-66-36-4
Dedura Palomero D.
Hemery C.
6-42-66-3
Llamas Ruiz P.
Zahraj P.
6-36-2
Rosenkranz M.
Andrade A.
6-16-2
Ferreira Silva F.
Prado Angelo J.
6-26-3
Gaubas V.[2]
Damm M.
6-746-37-63
Montes De La Torre I.
Kolar Z.[8]
7-647-64
Torres T.
Brunclik P.
7-50-67-61
Erhard M.
Uchida K.
7-646-2
Galarneau A.
Kym J.
6-26-2
Holmgren A.
Soriano Barrera A.
7-646-1
Moro Canas A.
Rocha H.[5]
3-66-46-4
Kukushkin M.
Landaluce M.[3]
6-26-1
Gakhov I.
Rodionov J.[6]
7-56-3