Corentin Denolly vs Hyeon Chung — Phan Thiet 2 CH Round of 32

Phan Thiet 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Corentin Denolly
#423ATP
1331ELO
1271Hard ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 January 2026
hard
KOR
Hyeon Chung
#549ATP
1488ELO
1459Hard ELO
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLL
Denolly C.
6-2 6-4
Chung H.
Denolly C.
662
Chung H.
240

Corentin Denolly defeated Hyeon Chung 6-2 6-4 in the Phan Thiet 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Denolly C.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Chung H.

Chung H.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Denolly C.

Serve advantage — Chung H.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Denolly C.Chung H.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
45%
Service points won·Even
59%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.1
2.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.8
5.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (14 vs 16). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Denolly C.Chung H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
50
24
Break points saved·Even
72
69
Break points won·Dominant
13
43
Deciding sets·Dominant
83
21
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Denolly C.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Chung H.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
2.7Hard Elo 1271
Surface ELO
7.3+188 Hard Elo edge
3.0Overall Elo 1331
ELO gap
7.0Overall Elo 1488
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.9
Surface form
7.8
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
2.0
4.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Simakin I.
Zhou Y.[6]
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Zhou Y.[6]
Michalski D.[7]
7-630-0
Simakin I.
Sakellaridis S.
3-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Michalski D.[7]
Bax F.
6-26-4
Simakin I.
Barsukov N.
7-627-5
Zhou Y.[6]
Hsu Y.[4]
7-646-3
Sakellaridis S.
Martin Tiffon P.[8]
6-26-3
R16
Bax F.
Gengel M.
6-21-0
Barsukov N.
Sin S.
6-16-3
Simakin I.
Bar Biryukov P.
4-66-46-2
Sakellaridis S.
Bailly G.[3]
6-36-2
Martin Tiffon P.[8]
Jones M.
6-26-2
Zhou Y.[6]
Denolly C.
6-17-62
Hsu Y.[4]
Blanch D.
6-03-66-3
Michalski D.[7]
Jasika O.
6-41-66-1
R32
Sin S.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-33-62-1
Bax F.
Sun F.
2-66-36-4
Barsukov N.
Gomez F.[1]
7-637-5
Bar Biryukov P.
Ribecai M.
6-46-2
Simakin I.
Cina F.[5]
6-33-66-3
Sakellaridis S.
Kwon S.
6-26-3
Martin Tiffon P.[8]
Vu H.
6-16-2
Zhou Y.[6]
Cui J.
6-37-64
Blanch D.
Ferguson C.
6-06-1
Hsu Y.[4]
Bertrand R.
7-57-65
Michalski D.[7]
Handel T.
7-56-1
Gengel M.
Crawford O.[2]
1-66-16-1
Jasika O.
Marmousez L.
3-4
Denolly C.
Chung H.
6-26-4
Jones M.
Sharipov M.
6-37-64
Bailly G.[3]
Matsuoka H.
6-16-3