Nikolai Barsukov vs Federico Agustin Gomez — Phan Thiet 2 CH Round of 32

Phan Thiet 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Nikolai Barsukov
#735ATP
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 January 2026
hard
ARG1
Federico Agustin Gomez
#209ATP
1445ELO
1403Hard ELO
$29kYTD
$680kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLLLW
Barsukov N.
7-6 7-5
Gomez F.
Barsukov N.
7772
Gomez F.
6350

Nikolai Barsukov defeated Federico Agustin Gomez 7-6 7-5 in the Phan Thiet 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Barsukov N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gomez F.

Gomez F.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Barsukov N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Barsukov N.Gomez F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
39%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
52%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.8
4.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
6.0
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (4 vs 18). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Barsukov N.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gomez F.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
6.3
0.0
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Barsukov N.Gomez F.
Freshness·
—
52

Gomez F.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 111 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Simakin I.
Zhou Y.[6]
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Zhou Y.[6]
Michalski D.[7]
7-630-0
Simakin I.
Sakellaridis S.
3-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Michalski D.[7]
Bax F.
6-26-4
Simakin I.
Barsukov N.
7-627-5
Zhou Y.[6]
Hsu Y.[4]
7-646-3
Sakellaridis S.
Martin Tiffon P.[8]
6-26-3
R16
Bax F.
Gengel M.
6-21-0
Barsukov N.
Sin S.
6-16-3
Simakin I.
Bar Biryukov P.
4-66-46-2
Sakellaridis S.
Bailly G.[3]
6-36-2
Martin Tiffon P.[8]
Jones M.
6-26-2
Zhou Y.[6]
Denolly C.
6-17-62
Hsu Y.[4]
Blanch D.
6-03-66-3
Michalski D.[7]
Jasika O.
6-41-66-1
R32
Sin S.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-33-62-1
Bax F.
Sun F.
2-66-36-4
Barsukov N.
Gomez F.[1]
7-637-5
Bar Biryukov P.
Ribecai M.
6-46-2
Simakin I.
Cina F.[5]
6-33-66-3
Sakellaridis S.
Kwon S.
6-26-3
Martin Tiffon P.[8]
Vu H.
6-16-2
Zhou Y.[6]
Cui J.
6-37-64
Blanch D.
Ferguson C.
6-06-1
Hsu Y.[4]
Bertrand R.
7-57-65
Michalski D.[7]
Handel T.
7-56-1
Gengel M.
Crawford O.[2]
1-66-16-1
Jasika O.
Marmousez L.
3-4
Denolly C.
Chung H.
6-26-4
Jones M.
Sharipov M.
6-37-64
Bailly G.[3]
Matsuoka H.
6-16-3