Zsombor Piros vs Daniil Glinka — Oeiras 1 CH Semi-final

Oeiras 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1629Hard ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 January 2026
hard
EST
Daniil Glinka
#167ATP
1477ELO
1491Hard ELO
$127kYTD
$264kCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWLW
Piros Z.
7-5 4-6 6-1
Glinka D.
Piros Z.
7462
Glinka D.
5611

Zsombor Piros defeated Daniil Glinka 7-5 4-6 6-1 in the Oeiras 1 CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Zsombor Piros came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 4–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Glinka D.

Glinka D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Glinka D.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
70%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.8
4.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (28 vs 29). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Glinka D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
23
Break points saved·Even
84
82
Break points won·Clear edge
32
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
6
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
48
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Glinka D.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.5+138 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.5Hard Elo 1491
6.9Overall Elo 1661
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1477
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.7
Surface form
6.4
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.9
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Glinka D.
Freshness·Dominant
48
86

Piros Z.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d) · Glinka D.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Rodesch C.
Piros Z.
6-44-66-2
Semi-finals
Rodesch C.
Gaubas V.[3]
7-657-67
Piros Z.
Glinka D.
7-54-66-1
Quarter-finals
Gaubas V.[3]
Kukushkin M.
6-46-3
Piros Z.
Riedi L.
6-33-1
Rodesch C.
Rosenkranz M.
6-37-63
Glinka D.
Passaro F.[4]
7-56-4
R16
Riedi L.
Andrade A.
6-47-65
Rosenkranz M.
Torres T.
1-66-46-4
Rodesch C.
Rodionov J.[7]
6-46-3
Gaubas V.[3]
Brunclik P.
6-11-66-3
Kukushkin M.
Lajal M.
6-746-27-5
Piros Z.
Yevseyev D.
6-16-2
Glinka D.
Mejia N.[8]
6-36-3
Passaro F.[4]
Kozlov S.
6-31-66-1
R32
Kukushkin M.
Elias G.
6-26-3
Riedi L.
Rocha H.[5]
6-46-2
Andrade A.
Pereira T.
6-46-4
Yevseyev D.
Kym J.
6-46-756-2
Piros Z.
Zink T.
7-646-3
Torres T.
Harris B.[1]
6-44-66-3
Rosenkranz M.
Prado Angelo J.
6-26-4
Kozlov S.
Galarneau A.
7-622-66-1
Passaro F.[4]
Hemery C.
7-666-2
Glinka D.
Onclin G.
5-77-666-4
Mejia N.[8]
Kolar Z.
2-66-47-64
Gaubas V.[3]
Moro Canas A.
6-717-646-1
Brunclik P.
Squire H.
6-06-2
Rodesch C.
Holmgren A.
6-36-2
Rodionov J.[7]
Kasnikowski M.
6-27-66
Lajal M.
Merida Aguilar D.[6]
6-26-2