Chelsea Fontenel vs Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin — W35 Petit-Bourg (Guadeloupe) Round of 32

W35 Petit-Bourg (Guadeloupe) · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SUI
Chelsea Fontenel
#657WTA
1219ELO
1242Hard ELO
22 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLLW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 January 2026
hard
MEX
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
28 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLLL
Fontenel C.
6-4 6-1
Nava Elkin A.
Fontenel C.
662
Nava Elkin A.
41–

Chelsea Fontenel defeated Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin 6-4 6-1 in the W35 Petit-Bourg (Guadeloupe) round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin came in defending last year's round of 16, but Chelsea Fontenel had been the form player, winning 4 of their last 9 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fontenel C.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Nava Elkin A.

Nava Elkin A.serving50% hold

wins 50% of points on serve vs Fontenel C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fontenel C.Nava Elkin A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
72%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
58%
2nd serve points won·Clear edge
45%
31%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
50%
Return points won·Even
44%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Even
1.6
1.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (14 vs 4). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fontenel C.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Nava Elkin A.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
0.6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 10
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Rouvroy M.
Pavlova K.
3-66-36-1
Semi-finals
Rouvroy M.
Glushko L.
6-46-2
Pavlova K.
Lene E.
5-4
Quarter-finals
Pavlova K.
Mushika M.
1-66-46-4
Rouvroy M.
Mpetshi Perricard D.
6-26-4
Lene E.
Daniel J.
2-67-634-2
Glushko L.
Lim A.
7-53-1
R16
Glushko L.
Danilova O.
6-26-1
Mushika M.
Nilsson L.
3-66-26-1
Mpetshi Perricard D.
Tran D.
2-66-36-4
Lene E.
Payet P.
7-656-1
Daniel J.
Fontenel C.
6-26-3
Rouvroy M.
Popovic K.
6-16-1
Pavlova K.
Lim J.
7-646-2
Lim A.
Kabbaj Y.
6-36-3
R32
Payet P.
Vakalapudi S.
6-16-1
Glushko L.
Belgraver J.
6-786-26-2
Nilsson L.
Gimbrere J.
7-6106-4
Rouvroy M.
Marton I.
6-16-4
Daniel J.
Wirges A.
6-16-3
Danilova O.
Molongo J.
6-06-0
Tran D.
Briand C.
6-36-4
Lim A.
Yang Y.
3-67-56-2
Mpetshi Perricard D.
Lollia M.
6-46-4
Lim J.
Moutama A.
6-16-1
Mushika M.
De Oliveira E.
6-36-3
Lene E.
Colyer R.
6-16-1
Popovic K.
Dean J.
6-16-1
Pavlova K.
Van Poppel E.
6-36-3
Fontenel C.
Nava Elkin A.
6-46-1