Kimmer Coppejans vs Dmitry Popko — Soma Bay CH Round of 32

Soma Bay CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL
Kimmer Coppejans
#222ATP
1544ELO
1469Hard ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLWLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 January 2026
hard
Dmitry Popko
KAZ6
Dmitry Popko
#652ATP
1385ELO
1400Hard ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Coppejans K.
1-6 6-3 6-2
Popko D.
Coppejans K.
1662
Popko D.
6321

Kimmer Coppejans defeated Dmitry Popko 1-6 6-3 6-2 in the Soma Bay CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Coppejans K.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Popko D.

Popko D.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Serve advantage — Coppejans K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coppejans K.Popko D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
62%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
53%
Service points won·Even
59%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
44%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.7
5.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
4.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (33 vs 3). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coppejans K.Popko D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
44
3
Break points saved·Clear edge
67
54
Break points won·Clear edge
29
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
9
Tiebreaks·Dominant
43
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Coppejans K.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 77 days (−1.2)
Popko D.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 56 days (−1.0)
Form & Matchup
5.8+70 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Hard Elo 1400
6.9Overall Elo 1544
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1385
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
4.7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Coppejans K.Popko D.
Freshness·Even
72
75

Coppejans K.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 56 games (7d) · Popko D.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 60 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Harris L.[5]
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
6-15-2
Semi-finals
Harris L.[5]
Butvilas E.
6-727-56-3
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
Gojo B.
7-656-1
Quarter-finals
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
Zahraj P.
6-16-2
Gojo B.
Neumayer L.[7]
5-77-56-3
Harris L.[5]
Mrva M.
6-35-76-2
Butvilas E.
Pacheco Mendez R.[8]
6-16-4
R16
Butvilas E.
Ajdukovic D.
6-17-66
Mrva M.
Blancaneaux G.
6-26-4
Harris L.[5]
Geerts M.
6-16-756-1
Zahraj P.
Coppejans K.
7-646-4
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
Durasovic V.
6-16-4
Neumayer L.[7]
Bassem Sobhy M.
6-17-63
Gojo B.
Schwaerzler J.
6-46-1
Pacheco Mendez R.[8]
Kirkin E.
7-56-4
R32
Butvilas E.
Den Ouden G.[1]
7-53-66-3
Pacheco Mendez R.[8]
Mckennon M.
6-16-4
Mrva M.
Albot R.
6-36-1
Harris L.[5]
Purtseladze S.
6-26-2
Coppejans K.
Popko D.[6]
1-66-36-2
Zahraj P.
Zakaryia F.
6-26-1
Durasovic V.
Paire B.
4-66-36-1
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
Gentzsch T.
6-17-65
Neumayer L.[7]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-0
Bassem Sobhy M.
Kopp S.
6-43-66-3
Gojo B.
Clarke J.[2]
6-16-4
Schwaerzler J.
Napolitano S.
3-67-600-0
Ajdukovic D.
Gulin S.
7-51-67-62
Kirkin E.
Boogaard T.
2-66-36-3
Geerts M.
Martineau M.
7-636-1
Blancaneaux G.
Giustino L.[4]
6-26-1