Hyeon Chung vs Ryan Peniston — Phan Thiet 1 CH Round of 32

Phan Thiet 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
KOR
Hyeon Chung
#549ATP
1488ELO
1459Hard ELO
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 January 2026
hard
Ryan Peniston
GBR7
Ryan Peniston
#389ATP
1441ELO
1402Hard ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Chung H.
6-4 6-4
Peniston R.
Chung H.
662
Peniston R.
440

Hyeon Chung defeated Ryan Peniston 6-4 6-4 in the Phan Thiet 1 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Hyeon Chung edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Chung H.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Peniston R.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Chung H.

Serve advantage — Chung H.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Chung H.Peniston R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
43%
Service points won·Even
58%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
43%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.3
1.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
5.4
4.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (16 vs 4). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Chung H.Peniston R.
Clutch Rating·Even
24
20
Break points saved·Slight edge
69
60
Break points won·Clear edge
43
25
Deciding sets·Clear edge
21
36
Tiebreaks·Even
15
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Chung H.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Peniston R.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.7+57 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.3Hard Elo 1402
5.6Overall Elo 1488
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1441
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
4.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
4.9
Minutes 14d
8.1
0.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kwon S.
Simakin I.
6-27-65
Semi-finals
Kwon S.
Marmousez L.
6-02-1
Simakin I.
Michalski D.
6-766-16-3
Quarter-finals
Kwon S.
Rehberg M.
6-27-62
Michalski D.
Blanch D.
5-77-636-3
Marmousez L.
Bar Biryukov P.
6-36-1
Simakin I.
Bertrand R.
7-635-76-4
R16
Simakin I.
Jasika O.
6-36-0
Michalski D.
Cina F.
6-26-4
Bar Biryukov P.
Gengel M.
6-43-67-5
Marmousez L.
Skatov T.[3]
6-46-4
Kwon S.
Barsukov N.
6-16-1
Blanch D.
Ribecai M.
6-46-796-1
Bertrand R.
Chung H.
6-747-636-2
Rehberg M.
Weber A.
6-36-1
R32
Skatov T.[3]
Sharipov M.
6-777-654-4
Simakin I.
Martin Tiffon P.
2-66-37-5
Chung H.
Peniston R.[7]
6-46-4
Cina F.
Crawford O.[4]
6-46-3
Michalski D.
Uchida K.
3-66-36-3
Ribecai M.
Sakellaridis S.
7-696-3
Blanch D.
Hsu Y.[8]
6-23-66-2
Barsukov N.
Mikrut L.[2]
3-66-27-64
Bertrand R.
Dodig M.
7-55-2
Weber A.
Vu H.
6-06-0
Bar Biryukov P.
Sun F.
6-46-3
Jasika O.
Watanuki Y.[1]
2-66-37-5
Gengel M.
Pavlovic L.[6]
6-26-2
Marmousez L.
Trotter J.
7-656-736-4
Rehberg M.
Bailly G.[5]
3-66-16-4
Kwon S.
Zhou Y.
6-26-2