Thijs Boogaard vs Dali Blanch — Soma Bay CH Qualifying Round 2
Soma Bay CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 January 2026
hard
Umpiry Score
Pre-match3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited- Extended break: 224 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
Surface form
3.9
0.0
Win streak0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Surface transitionContext
5.0
Defending pts6.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Boogaard T.
662
Blanch D.
440
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Statistics
Recent form58%1st serve in+1%57%
71%1st serve points won+2%69%
45%2nd serve points won+8%53%
60%Service points won+2%62%
36%Return points won+7%43%
62%Break points saved+8%54%
2.2Aces / match+1.53.7
4Double faults / match+1.52.5
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (10 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw — qualifying
Q2
Mckennon M.
Bittoun Kouzmine C.
7-627-63
Napolitano S.[7]
Hernandez Serrano J.[2]
6-47-65
Kirkin E.
Tkemaladze Z.
6-26-1
Albot R.[4]
Fonio G.[12]
4-66-16-4
Boogaard T.
Blanch D.[9]
6-46-4
Gulin S.[11]
Binda A.[6]
6-26-3
Q1
Bittoun Kouzmine C.
Martin D.[1]
6-44-66-2
Mckennon M.
Erel Y.[8]
6-26-1
Hernandez Serrano J.[2]
Mcdonald N.
6-47-5
Tkemaladze Z.
Ursu V.[3]
6-23-66-4
Kirkin E.
Ferrari G.[10]
6-46-3
Albot R.[4]
Ostapenkov D.
4-66-26-3
Fonio G.[12]
Miladinovic M.
6-26-2
Boogaard T.
Wiskandt M.[5]
7-56-4
Blanch D.[9]
Krajci M.
6-22-1
Binda A.[6]
Sorger S.
6-46-4
Gulin S.[11]
Kivattsev K.
6-26-2
Napolitano S.[7]
Peliwo F.
6-46-3