Dusan Lajovic vs Facundo Diaz AcostaAustralian Open Qualifying Round 1

Australian Open · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
#153ATP
1620ELO
1559Hard ELO
$208kYTD
$11MCAREER
36 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 January 2026
hard
#120ATP
1681ELO
1533Hard ELO
$264kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWLL
Lajovic D.
7-6 5-7 7-6
Diaz Acosta F.
Lajovic D.
775772
Diaz Acosta F.
637631

Dusan Lajovic defeated Facundo Diaz Acosta 7-6 5-7 7-6 in the Australian Open qualifying round 1 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Facundo Diaz Acosta came in ranked #120, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 64. Dusan Lajovic claimed a first win over Facundo Diaz Acosta in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

01
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-02-12Buenos AiresQFclayFacundo Diaz Acosta6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Lajovic D.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Diaz Acosta F.

Diaz Acosta F.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Lajovic D.

Serve advantage — Diaz Acosta F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
2.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.4
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (31 vs 32). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Even
60
60
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
89
Break points won·Even
36
33
Deciding sets·Even
72
70
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
61
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.0+25 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Hard Elo 1533
5.6Overall Elo 1620
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1681
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
5.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
7.9
Prev. match
7.0
4.8
Country comfort
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·Dominant
97
51

Lajovic D.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Diaz Acosta F.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 131 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
31°CPartly cloudy
Wind 5 km/hHumidity 28%
Q1
Basavareddy N.
Galarneau A.
6-46-2
Droguet T.
Jarry N.[21]
6-46-3
Boyer T.
Barrena A.
6-26-746-2
Hassan B.
Dodig M.
5-76-36-2
Ofner S.[19]
Holmgren A.
6-46-4
Svajda Z.[29]
Habib H.
6-16-3
Wong C.
Blanchet U.[31]
6-37-66
Gaubas V.[17]
Moreno De Alboran N.
7-56-3
Cassone M.
Hsu Y.
3-66-36-4
Molcan A.
Shimabukuro S.
6-44-66-3
Prizmic D.[14]
Olivieri G.
6-16-4
Budkov Kjaer N.[23]
Watanuki Y.
6-757-56-4
Jodar R.
Tu L.
6-26-1
Lajovic D.[13]
Diaz Acosta F.
7-635-77-63
Loffhagen G.
Engel J.
7-647-62
Mccabe J.
Marinkov P.
6-27-65
Passaro F.[27]
Lajal M.
7-646-4
Burruchaga R.[2]
Peniston R.
6-16-1
Coppejans K.
Jasika O.
7-626-0
Grenier H.
Galan D.
7-691-0
Draxl L.[20]
Bouzige M.
7-636-3
Glinka D.
Tabur C.
5-76-36-4
Rocha H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-4
Rodesch C.
Harris B.[15]
6-36-4
Klein L.[28]
Piros Z.
6-46-4
Gea A.
Kolar Z.
6-26-3
Seyboth Wild T.
Guillen Meza A.
7-56-3
Damm M.
Onclin G.
6-33-66-4
Vallejo A.[30]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-16-2
Zeppieri G.
Added D.
6-36-3
Riedi L.
Choinski J.[11]
6-36-4
Rodionov J.
Ficovich J.
7-56-3
Mcdonald M.[6]
Popko D.
6-746-47-5
Sweeny D.
Pellegrino A.[26]
6-24-66-3
Blockx A.[7]
Cecchinato M.
6-36-4
Kym J.
Prado Angelo J.
6-36-0
Van Assche L.
Echargui M.[22]
6-46-4
Landaluce M.
Tseng C.[10]
7-56-3
Sachko V.
Durasovic V.
6-37-61
Moller E.[9]
Polmans M.
6-47-66
Sakamoto R.
Evans D.
6-16-2
Zheng M.
Hewitt C.
6-36-3
Llamas Ruiz P.
Bernet H.
3-66-37-63
Trungelliti M.[18]
Sekulic P.
6-21-66-1
Barrios Vera T.[4]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-27-66
Holt B.[5]
Neumayer L.
4-66-26-3
Wu Y.
Krueger M.
7-56-4
Cina F.
Harris L.
6-46-746-3
Ymer E.
Bolt A.
7-647-65
Herbert P.
Den Ouden G.
3-66-36-2
Smith C.[32]
Pavlovic L.
7-646-1
Faria J.
Mikrut L.
7-627-5
Carballes Baena R.[16]
Bouquier A.
6-26-2
Fery A.
Winter E.
6-26-4
Travaglia S.
Ellis B.
6-34-66-1
Merida Aguilar D.
Crawford O.
6-32-66-3
Kubler J.
Mayot H.
6-36-4
Mejia N.
Virtanen O.[12]
6-33-66-4
Nishioka Y.[8]
Fatic N.
6-16-2
Bailly G.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-46-4
Bueno G.
Basilashvili N.[3]
6-17-65
Maestrelli F.[24]
Giustino L.
7-646-1
Heide G.
Clarke J.
6-36-3
Tomic B.
Dellien H.[25]
6-36-3