Iva Jovic vs Janice Tjen — Hobart Round of 32

Hobart · WTA · Round of 32
Iva Jovic
USA3
Iva Jovic
#16WTA
1906ELO
1847Hard ELO
$1.3MYTD
$2.4MCAREER
18 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 January 2026
hard
INA
Janice Tjen
#42WTA
1658ELO
1684Hard ELO
$630kYTD
$984kCAREER
24 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWL
Jovic I.
6-0 6-1
Tjen J.
Jovic I.
662
Tjen J.
010

Iva Jovic defeated Janice Tjen 6-0 6-1 in the Hobart round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Iva Jovic came in ranked #16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jovic I.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Tjen J.

Tjen J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Jovic I.

Serve advantage — Jovic I.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Jovic I.Tjen J.
40
Serve
53
70
Return
13

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Jovic I.Tjen J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
60%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
44%
39%
Break points saved·Clear edge
60%
47%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 16). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jovic I.Tjen J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
91
78
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
84
Break points won·Clear edge
98
85
Deciding sets·Clear edge
92
75
Tiebreaks·
—
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jovic I.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Tjen J.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.0+163 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Hard Elo 1684
6.1Overall Elo 1906
ELO gap
3.9Overall Elo 1658
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
7.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.9
Minutes 14d
8.6
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jovic I.Tjen J.
Freshness·Slight edge
84
94

Jovic I.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 26 games (7d) · Tjen J.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
20°COvercast
Wind 8 km/hHumidity 54%

Draw

Final
Cocciaretto E.
Jovic I.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Jovic I.[3]
Preston T.
4-66-46-1
Cocciaretto E.
Ruzic A.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Preston T.
Raducanu E.[1]
6-26-4
Cocciaretto E.
Bondar A.
6-26-2
Jovic I.[3]
Linette M.[8]
6-36-756-2
Ruzic A.
Danilovic O.
6-36-3
R16
Raducanu E.[1]
Frech M.
W/O
Bondar A.
Maria T.[6]
7-677-5
Jovic I.[3]
Zarazua R.
6-16-2
Ruzic A.
Sierra S.
7-56-4
Cocciaretto E.
Li A.[4]
1-67-57-5
Danilovic O.
Stearns P.
7-626-1
Linette M.[8]
Wang X.
6-17-5
Preston T.
Sramkova R.
6-46-1
R32
Jovic I.[3]
Tjen J.
6-06-1
Zarazua R.
Baptiste H.
6-756-36-3
Danilovic O.
Kessler M.[2]
4-66-46-4
Maria T.[6]
Williams V.
6-46-3
Ruzic A.
Arango E.[7]
7-56-1
Linette M.[8]
Selekhmeteva O.
6-31-66-1
Stearns P.
Krejcikova B.
6-41-67-64
Preston T.
Bouzas Maneiro J.[5]
6-47-64
Wang X.
Gibson T.
6-26-3
Cocciaretto E.
Shimizu A.
6-36-4
Li A.[4]
Volynets K.
4-67-56-2
Raducanu E.[1]
Osorio C.
6-37-62
Frech M.
Jacquemot E.
6-46-0
Bondar A.
Seidel E.
6-06-1
Sierra S.
Mcnally C.
1-66-46-1
Sramkova R.
Gracheva V.
6-44-66-2