Tomas Machac vs Quentin Halys — Adelaide Round of 16

Adelaide · ATP · Round of 16
Tomas Machac
CZE8
Tomas Machac
#49ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 January 2026
hard
Quentin Halys
FRA
Quentin Halys
#95ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
Machac T.
6-4 6-2
Halys Q.
Machac T.
662
Halys Q.
420

Tomas Machac defeated Quentin Halys 6-4 6-2 in the Adelaide round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tomas Machac came in ranked #49. Tomas Machac claimed a first win over Quentin Halys in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-05-26Roland GarrosR128clayQuentin Halys7-6(4) 4-1 RET
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Halys Q.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Halys Q.
30
Serve
35
25
Return
26

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Halys Q.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
68%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
68%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.2
10.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (20 vs 35). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Halys Q.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
57
Break points saved·Even
98
97
Break points won·Dominant
80
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
94
75
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
97
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Machac T.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Halys Q.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.9+153 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Hard Elo 1677
7.0Overall Elo 1866
ELO gap
3.0Overall Elo 1707
5.0
H2H
5.0
1.7
Surface form
6.4
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
6.1
7.0
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
5.4
Country comfort
4.9
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Machac T.Halys Q.
Freshness·
—
89

Halys Q.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
25°CClear
Wind 15 km/hHumidity 32%
Final
Machac T.[8]
Humbert U.
6-46-726-2
Semi-finals
Machac T.[8]
Paul T.[2]
2-66-36-3
Humbert U.
Davidovich Fokina A.[1]
6-35-77-64
Quarter-finals
Paul T.[2]
Vukic A.
6-36-2
Davidovich Fokina A.[1]
Vacherot V.[5]
7-646-2
Humbert U.
Shevchenko A.
6-06-3
Machac T.[8]
Munar J.
6-46-4
R16
Vacherot V.[5]
Kokkinakis T.
W/O
Vukic A.
Vavassori A.
6-27-65
Machac T.[8]
Halys Q.
6-46-2
Humbert U.
Griekspoor T.[4]
6-46-1
Munar J.
Cerundolo F.[3]
3-67-56-4
Paul T.[2]
Opelka R.
6-46-4
Shevchenko A.
Fucsovics M.
6-37-66
Davidovich Fokina A.[1]
Hijikata R.
6-36-2
R32
Vukic A.
Tsitsipas S.[7]
7-637-65
Humbert U.
Atmane T.
6-37-63
Opelka R.
Popyrin A.
6-37-66
Vacherot V.[5]
Kecmanovic M.
7-656-4
Halys Q.
Fearnley J.
6-36-4
Munar J.
Altmaier D.
6-36-0
Machac T.[8]
Duckworth J.
6-36-3
Fucsovics M.
Quinn E.
6-46-4
Hijikata R.
Schoolkate T.
6-46-4
Shevchenko A.
Dzumhur D.
4-66-47-5
Kokkinakis T.
Korda S.
3-66-37-63
Vavassori A.
Diallo G.
6-37-64