Xin Yu Wang vs Talia Gibson — Hobart Round of 32

Hobart · WTA · Round of 32
CHN
Xin Yu Wang
1760ELO
1716Hard ELO
24 yrs · 182 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 January 2026
hard
Talia Gibson
AUS
Talia Gibson
#58WTA
1737ELO
1764Hard ELO
22 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLLL
Wang X.
6-2 6-3
Gibson T.
Wang X.
662
Gibson T.
230

Xin Yu Wang defeated Talia Gibson 6-2 6-3 in the Hobart round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Xin Yu Wang came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Xin Yu Wang extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-08-17ClevelandR16hardXin Yu Wang1-6 6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Wang X.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gibson T.

Gibson T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Wang X.

Serve advantage — Gibson T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Wang X.Gibson T.
25
Serve
60
40
Return
0

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wang X.Gibson T.
1st serve in·Even
66%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
63%
Return points won·Even
43%
44%
Break points saved·Even
55%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.5
6.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (21 vs 32). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wang X.Gibson T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
60
74
Break points saved·Even
86
83
Break points won·Slight edge
78
70
Deciding sets·Even
86
83
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wang X.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Gibson T.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.2Hard Elo 1716
Surface ELO
5.8+49 Hard Elo edge
4.8Overall Elo 1760
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 1737
10.0
H2H
0.0
5.0
Surface form
7.1
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.7
Minutes 14d
8.8
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Country comfort
5.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wang X.Gibson T.
Freshness·
—
96

Gibson T.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
20°COvercast
Wind 8 km/hHumidity 54%

Draw

Final
Cocciaretto E.
Jovic I.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Jovic I.[3]
Preston T.
4-66-46-1
Cocciaretto E.
Ruzic A.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Preston T.
Raducanu E.[1]
6-26-4
Cocciaretto E.
Bondar A.
6-26-2
Jovic I.[3]
Linette M.[8]
6-36-756-2
Ruzic A.
Danilovic O.
6-36-3
R16
Raducanu E.[1]
Frech M.
W/O
Bondar A.
Maria T.[6]
7-677-5
Jovic I.[3]
Zarazua R.
6-16-2
Ruzic A.
Sierra S.
7-56-4
Cocciaretto E.
Li A.[4]
1-67-57-5
Danilovic O.
Stearns P.
7-626-1
Linette M.[8]
Wang X.
6-17-5
Preston T.
Sramkova R.
6-46-1
R32
Jovic I.[3]
Tjen J.
6-06-1
Zarazua R.
Baptiste H.
6-756-36-3
Danilovic O.
Kessler M.[2]
4-66-46-4
Maria T.[6]
Williams V.
6-46-3
Ruzic A.
Arango E.[7]
7-56-1
Linette M.[8]
Selekhmeteva O.
6-31-66-1
Stearns P.
Krejcikova B.
6-41-67-64
Preston T.
Bouzas Maneiro J.[5]
6-47-64
Wang X.
Gibson T.
6-26-3
Cocciaretto E.
Shimizu A.
6-36-4
Li A.[4]
Volynets K.
4-67-56-2
Raducanu E.[1]
Osorio C.
6-37-62
Frech M.
Jacquemot E.
6-46-0
Bondar A.
Seidel E.
6-06-1
Sierra S.
Mcnally C.
1-66-46-1
Sramkova R.
Gracheva V.
6-44-66-2