Marek Gengel vs Renta Tokuda — Nonthaburi 2 CH Round of 32

Nonthaburi 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Marek Gengel
CZE
Marek Gengel
#370ATP
1411ELO
1377Hard ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 January 2026
hard
Renta Tokuda
JPN
Renta Tokuda
#392ATP
1224ELO
1197Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLLLL
Gengel M.
6-7 6-0 6-4
Tokuda R.
Gengel M.
63662
Tokuda R.
77041

Marek Gengel defeated Renta Tokuda 6-7 6-0 6-4 in the Nonthaburi 2 CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Marek Gengel came in ranked #370, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gengel M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Tokuda R.

Tokuda R.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gengel M.

Serve advantage — Gengel M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gengel M.Tokuda R.
1st serve in·Even
64%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
43%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.0
2.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
1.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (19 vs 11). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gengel M.Tokuda R.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
11
0
Break points saved·Clear edge
35
54
Break points won·Slight edge
11
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
53
0
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
4
11

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gengel M.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Tokuda R.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.2+181 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.8Hard Elo 1197
7.3Overall Elo 1411
ELO gap
2.7Overall Elo 1224
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.1
Surface form
3.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.9
Minutes 14d
8.6
4.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Martin Tiffon P.
Jones M.
6-43-66-4
Semi-finals
Jones M.
Noguchi R.[1]
4-66-16-2
Martin Tiffon P.
Skatov T.[2]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Martin Tiffon P.
Sharipov M.
2-66-27-613
Noguchi R.[1]
Gengel M.
4-67-637-5
Jones M.
Zhou Y.[3]
4-67-646-4
Skatov T.[2]
Bax F.
6-26-4
R16
Noguchi R.[1]
Nagal S.
2-2
Martin Tiffon P.
Uchida K.[5]
6-36-3
Gengel M.
Uchiyama Y.
6-47-5
Bax F.
Zhukayev B.
6-26-4
Skatov T.[2]
Samrej K.
6-46-2
Jones M.
Bar Biryukov P.
6-23-0
Sharipov M.
Michalski D.[4]
6-46-3
Zhou Y.[3]
Langmo C.
6-36-4
R32
Langmo C.
Cui J.
7-656-2
Skatov T.[2]
Ajdukovic D.
6-33-66-4
Noguchi R.[1]
Sakellaridis S.
6-46-2
Zhou Y.[3]
Oberleitner N.
6-36-1
Bar Biryukov P.
Martineau M.
5-76-37-62
Uchida K.[5]
Bertrand R.
3-67-56-1
Sharipov M.
Chung H.
6-36-2
Michalski D.[4]
Shimizu Y.
6-22-66-3
Zhukayev B.
Sun F.[8]
6-46-1
Martin Tiffon P.
Henning P.
4-67-52-0
Bax F.
Ilagan A.
6-47-63
Jones M.
Schwaerzler J.[6]
1-66-36-0
Uchiyama Y.
Martin A.[7]
6-36-1
Nagal S.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
6-16-3
Gengel M.
Tokuda R.
6-736-06-4
Samrej K.
Trotter J.
4-66-36-4