Bernard Tomic vs James Watt — Noumea CH Round of 16

Noumea CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Bernard Tomic
AUS8
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 5 January 2026
hard
NZL
James Watt
#852ATP
1328ELO
1322Hard ELO
26 yrs · 206 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLWL
Tomic B.
6-4 3-6 4-1
Watt J.
Tomic B.
634–
Watt J.
461–

Bernard Tomic advanced when James Watt retired 6-4 3-6 4-1 in the Noumea CH round of 16.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Watt J.

Watt J.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Watt J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
72%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
56%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
68%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.0
8.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.4
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (21 vs 9). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Watt J.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
6.7+119 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Hard Elo 1322
7.1Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
2.9Overall Elo 1328
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
6.2
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Watt J.
Freshness·
84
—

Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Gea A.
Rodionov J.[5]
6-34-67-5
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.[5]
Ellis B.
6-46-756-3
Gea A.
Zheng M.[6]
4-66-16-4
Quarter-finals
Ellis B.
Tomic B.[8]
7-643-66-4
Rodionov J.[5]
Thompson J.[1]
6-46-4
Zheng M.[6]
Tabur C.
3-66-46-2
Gea A.
Draxl L.[2]
6-36-2
R16
Tomic B.[8]
Watt J.
6-43-64-1
Zheng M.[6]
Added D.
6-26-1
Tabur C.
Droguet T.[3]
6-746-46-4
Draxl L.[2]
Bouzige M.
6-46-2
Thompson J.[1]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-46-3
Rodionov J.[5]
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Ellis B.
Ilagan A.
7-657-64
Gea A.
Diaz Acosta F.
7-656-3
R32
Thompson J.[1]
Hudd E.
6-37-65
Added D.
Sinclair C.
6-36-746-2
Tabur C.
Seyboth Wild T.
4-66-16-4
Droguet T.[3]
Onclin G.
6-36-2
Gea A.
Barrena A.[7]
6-46-0
Bouzige M.
Peniston R.
4-67-696-4
Draxl L.[2]
Heide G.
7-653-66-3
Rodionov J.[5]
Bernet H.
6-43-66-0
Ellis B.
Herbert P.[4]
7-54-66-4
Moreno De Alboran N.
Chazal M.
6-47-66
Langmo C.
Ogura K.
6-46-4
Tomic B.[8]
Glinka D.
6-46-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Dussin L.
6-26-3
Ilagan A.
Delaney J.
6-46-757-66
Watt J.
Vithoontien L.
7-656-1
Zheng M.[6]
Jasika O.
6-46-2