Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Jan Lennard Struff — Hong Kong Round of 32

Hong Kong · ATP · Round of 32
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1758ELO
1718Hard ELO
$537kYTD
$6.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 January 2026
hard
GER
Jan Lennard Struff
#80ATP
1684ELO
1629Hard ELO
$325kYTD
$13MCAREER
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWLL

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Jan Lennard Struff 6-3 1-6 6-1 in the Hong Kong round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Botic Van De Zandschulp came in ranked #55. Botic Van De Zandschulp narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van De Zandschulp B.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 64 days (−1.2)
Struff J.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 44 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
6.1+89 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.9Hard Elo 1629
5.8Overall Elo 1758
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1684
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.8
Surface form
3.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Van De Zandschulp B.
6162
Struff J.
3611

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-04-23Madrid MastersR128clayJan Lennard Struff7-5 2-6 4-1 RET
2024-04-15MunichR16clayJan Lennard Struff7-6(0) 6-4
2022-01-17Australian OpenR128hardBotic Van De Zandschulp6-4 6-3 6-2

Statistics

Recent form
Van De Zandschulp B.Struff J.
63%1st serve in+3%60%
73%1st serve points won+1%74%
47%2nd serve points won+4%51%
64%Service points won+1%65%
37%Return points won37%
58%Break points saved+3%61%
6.6Aces / match+1.88.4
4.4Double faults / match+1.52.9

Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Draw

Final
Bublik A.[2]
Musetti L.[1]
7-626-3
Semi-finals
Bublik A.[2]
Giron M.
3-66-46-2
Musetti L.[1]
Rublev A.[3]
6-737-56-4
Quarter-finals
Giron M.
Mmoh M.
6-31-0
Musetti L.[1]
Wong C.
6-46-4
Bublik A.[2]
Shang J.
6-17-62
Rublev A.[3]
Borges N.[8]
6-36-4
R16
Bublik A.[2]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-36-3
Wong C.
Diallo G.[6]
1-67-57-5
Shang J.
Sonego L.[5]
6-36-4
Rublev A.[3]
Wu Y.
3-66-26-1
Mmoh M.
Khachanov K.[4]
7-627-64
Giron M.
Muller A.[7]
6-47-64
Borges N.[8]
Cilic M.
7-56-3
Musetti L.[1]
Etcheverry T.
6-736-26-4
R32
Giron M.
Djere L.
6-26-0
Diallo G.[6]
De Jong J.
6-47-67
Borges N.[8]
Dzumhur D.
6-46-3
Muller A.[7]
Kecmanovic M.
7-56-4
Mmoh M.
Tabilo A.
7-56-4
Wu Y.
Marozsan F.
6-46-2
Wong C.
Navone M.
6-37-5
Etcheverry T.
Royer V.
6-47-5
Shang J.
Comesana F.
6-46-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Struff J.
6-31-66-1
Cilic M.
Mannarino A.
6-36-2
Sonego L.[5]
Sakamoto R.
6-27-64