Tomas Barrios Vera vs Philip Sekulic — Canberra CH Round of 32

Canberra CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tomas Barrios Vera
CHI4
Tomas Barrios Vera
#137ATP
1615ELO
1552Hard ELO
$205kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 January 2026
hard
AUS
Philip Sekulic
#322ATP
1390ELO
1363Hard ELO
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWLWW
Barrios Vera T.
6-4 6-4
Sekulic P.
Barrios Vera T.
662
Sekulic P.
440

Tomas Barrios Vera defeated Philip Sekulic 6-4 6-4 in the Canberra CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tomas Barrios Vera came in ranked #137.

Key context

  • Match story: Tomas Barrios Vera edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Barrios Vera T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Sekulic P.

Sekulic P.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Barrios Vera T.

Serve advantage — Sekulic P.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Barrios Vera T.Sekulic P.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.1
4.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (32 vs 18). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Barrios Vera T.Sekulic P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
27
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
79
Break points won·Dominant
43
9
Deciding sets·Slight edge
52
45
Tiebreaks·Dominant
90
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Barrios Vera T.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Sekulic P.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
8.0+189 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.0Hard Elo 1363
8.3Overall Elo 1615
ELO gap
1.7Overall Elo 1390
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
5.8
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Barrios Vera T.Sekulic P.
Freshness·Slight edge
83
90

Barrios Vera T.: 4 days rest · 1 match, 35 games (7d) · Sekulic P.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Blockx A.[6]
Jodar R.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Blockx A.[6]
Mccabe J.
6-36-736-3
Jodar R.
Jacquet K.
6-30-0
Quarter-finals
Jodar R.
Shimabukuro S.
6-26-4
Jacquet K.
Lajovic D.[8]
7-627-5
Blockx A.[6]
Kopriva V.[1]
7-55-76-4
Mccabe J.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
6-17-65
R16
Kopriva V.[1]
Klein L.
7-617-61
Jacquet K.
Galan D.
6-26-4
Shimabukuro S.
Rodesch C.
7-657-63
Mccabe J.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-47-64
Blockx A.[6]
Carballes Baena R.
7-683-67-5
Barrios Vera T.[4]
Blanchet U.
6-766-37-64
Lajovic D.[8]
Engel J.
6-47-64
Jodar R.
Faria J.
6-16-4
R32
Pinnington Jones J.
Holt B.[5]
6-46-2
Engel J.
Mejia N.
7-661-67-66
Shimabukuro S.
Winter E.
6-46-1
Rodesch C.
Nardi L.[2]
7-646-2
Kopriva V.[1]
Nishikori K.
6-12-2
Mccabe J.
Lajal M.
7-637-68
Galan D.
Neumayer L.
7-57-5
Blanchet U.
Rocha H.
6-36-4
Lajovic D.[8]
Ofner S.
6-36-2
Klein L.
Cassone M.
4-67-56-3
Carballes Baena R.
Smith C.
7-646-3
Blockx A.[6]
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-26-3
Barrios Vera T.[4]
Sekulic P.
6-46-4
Jacquet K.
Nishioka Y.[3]
2-66-17-5
Faria J.
Moller E.[7]
6-16-3
Jodar R.
Jarry N.
6-36-4