Jurij Rodionov vs Jordan Thompson — Noumea CH Quarter-final

Noumea CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jurij Rodionov
AUT5
Jurij Rodionov
#142ATP
1636ELO
1584Hard ELO
$205kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 January 2026
hard
Jordan Thompson
AUS1
Jordan Thompson
#156ATP
1772ELO
1733Hard ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWL
Rodionov J.
6-4 6-4
Thompson J.
Rodionov J.
662
Thompson J.
440

Jurij Rodionov defeated Jordan Thompson 6-4 6-4 in the Noumea CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Jurij Rodionov came in ranked #142.

Key context

  • Match story: Jurij Rodionov edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rodionov J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Thompson J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Rodionov J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rodionov J.Thompson J.
1st serve in·Even
59%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
77%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
59%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
69%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Clear edge
62%
50%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.2
10.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.6
0.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (29 vs 4). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rodionov J.Thompson J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
41
70
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
97
Break points won·Slight edge
17
24
Deciding sets·Dominant
49
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
54
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rodionov J.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 47 days (−0.7)
Thompson J.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 77 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
3.0Hard Elo 1584
Surface ELO
7.0+149 Hard Elo edge
2.9Overall Elo 1636
ELO gap
7.1Overall Elo 1772
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
4.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Rodionov J.Thompson J.
Freshness·
98
—

Rodionov J.: 10 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Gea A.
Rodionov J.[5]
6-34-67-5
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.[5]
Ellis B.
6-46-756-3
Gea A.
Zheng M.[6]
4-66-16-4
Quarter-finals
Ellis B.
Tomic B.[8]
7-643-66-4
Rodionov J.[5]
Thompson J.[1]
6-46-4
Zheng M.[6]
Tabur C.
3-66-46-2
Gea A.
Draxl L.[2]
6-36-2
R16
Tomic B.[8]
Watt J.
6-43-64-1
Zheng M.[6]
Added D.
6-26-1
Tabur C.
Droguet T.[3]
6-746-46-4
Draxl L.[2]
Bouzige M.
6-46-2
Thompson J.[1]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-46-3
Rodionov J.[5]
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Ellis B.
Ilagan A.
7-657-64
Gea A.
Diaz Acosta F.
7-656-3
R32
Thompson J.[1]
Hudd E.
6-37-65
Added D.
Sinclair C.
6-36-746-2
Tabur C.
Seyboth Wild T.
4-66-16-4
Droguet T.[3]
Onclin G.
6-36-2
Gea A.
Barrena A.[7]
6-46-0
Bouzige M.
Peniston R.
4-67-696-4
Draxl L.[2]
Heide G.
7-653-66-3
Rodionov J.[5]
Bernet H.
6-43-66-0
Ellis B.
Herbert P.[4]
7-54-66-4
Moreno De Alboran N.
Chazal M.
6-47-66
Langmo C.
Ogura K.
6-46-4
Tomic B.[8]
Glinka D.
6-46-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Dussin L.
6-26-3
Ilagan A.
Delaney J.
6-46-757-66
Watt J.
Vithoontien L.
7-656-1
Zheng M.[6]
Jasika O.
6-46-2