Alexander Ritschard vs Aidan Mchugh — Nottingham CH Qualifying Round 2

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
SUI11
Alexander Ritschard
#578ATP
1528ELO
1469Grass ELO
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 January 2026
grass
GBR3
Aidan Mchugh
#460ATP
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWLLWLL
Ritschard A.
6-7 6-2 6-2
Mchugh A.
Ritschard A.
66662
Mchugh A.
78221

Alexander Ritschard defeated Aidan Mchugh 6-7 6-2 6-2 in the Nottingham CH qualifying round 2 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ritschard A.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Mchugh A.

Mchugh A.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Ritschard A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season
Ritschard A.Mchugh A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
69%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
80%
2nd serve points won·Clear edge
56%
78%
Service points won·Clear edge
67%
79%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
34%
Break points saved·Dominant
59%
100%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.7
3.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.0
0.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (3 vs 1). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ritschard A.Mchugh A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
23
Break points saved·Clear edge
84
72
Break points won·Slight edge
14
5
Deciding sets·Slight edge
41
49
Tiebreaks·Dominant
60
11

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ritschard A.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Mchugh A.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
3.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Masur D.
Story J.[8]
6-26-3
Guerrieri A.[12]
Arnaboldi F.[2]
6-46-4
Ritschard A.[11]
Mchugh A.[3]
6-766-26-2
Overbeck C.
Jones B.
7-636-4
Matusevich A.
Wiskandt M.[6]
6-07-64
Kingsley C.
Murgett F.
6-26-766-3
Q1
Murgett F.
Fenty A.[7]
6-07-5
Wiskandt M.[6]
Brady P.
6-26-2
Matusevich A.
Peliwo F.[10]
6-36-3
Masur D.
Yevseyev D.[1]
7-626-2
Story J.[8]
Bass F.
7-676-4
Arnaboldi F.[2]
Compagnucci T.
6-26-3
Guerrieri A.[12]
Hurrion M.
6-16-1
Mchugh A.[3]
Sheehy J.
6-46-746-3
Ritschard A.[11]
Ehrenschneider N.
6-34-66-3
Jones B.
Albot R.[4]
6-746-37-67
Overbeck C.
Vives Marcos P.[9]
4-67-627-63
Kingsley C.
Karol M.[5]
4-67-626-4