Jurij Rodionov vs Christian Langmo — Noumea CH Round of 16

Noumea CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Jurij Rodionov
AUT5
Jurij Rodionov
#143ATP
1636ELO
1584Hard ELO
$205kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 January 2026
hard
Christian Langmo
USA
Christian Langmo
#467ATP
1267ELO
1254Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLWWLLW
Rodionov J.
6-3 6-4
Langmo C.
Rodionov J.
662
Langmo C.
340

Jurij Rodionov defeated Christian Langmo 6-3 6-4 in the Noumea CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Jurij Rodionov came in ranked #143.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rodionov J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Langmo C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Rodionov J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rodionov J.Langmo C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
70%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.2
6.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (29 vs 29). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rodionov J.Langmo C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
41
23
Break points saved·Even
89
88
Break points won·Clear edge
17
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
49
22
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
54
39

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rodionov J.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 47 days (−0.7)
Langmo C.
3.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
8.9+330 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.1Hard Elo 1254
9.3Overall Elo 1636
ELO gap
0.7Overall Elo 1267
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
2.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Rodionov J.Langmo C.
Freshness·Clear edge
99
86

Rodionov J.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Langmo C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Gea A.
Rodionov J.[5]
6-34-67-5
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.[5]
Ellis B.
6-46-756-3
Gea A.
Zheng M.[6]
4-66-16-4
Quarter-finals
Ellis B.
Tomic B.[8]
7-643-66-4
Rodionov J.[5]
Thompson J.[1]
6-46-4
Zheng M.[6]
Tabur C.
3-66-46-2
Gea A.
Draxl L.[2]
6-36-2
R16
Tomic B.[8]
Watt J.
6-43-64-1
Zheng M.[6]
Added D.
6-26-1
Tabur C.
Droguet T.[3]
6-746-46-4
Draxl L.[2]
Bouzige M.
6-46-2
Thompson J.[1]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-46-3
Rodionov J.[5]
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Ellis B.
Ilagan A.
7-657-64
Gea A.
Diaz Acosta F.
7-656-3
R32
Thompson J.[1]
Hudd E.
6-37-65
Added D.
Sinclair C.
6-36-746-2
Tabur C.
Seyboth Wild T.
4-66-16-4
Droguet T.[3]
Onclin G.
6-36-2
Gea A.
Barrena A.[7]
6-46-0
Bouzige M.
Peniston R.
4-67-696-4
Draxl L.[2]
Heide G.
7-653-66-3
Rodionov J.[5]
Bernet H.
6-43-66-0
Ellis B.
Herbert P.[4]
7-54-66-4
Moreno De Alboran N.
Chazal M.
6-47-66
Langmo C.
Ogura K.
6-46-4
Tomic B.[8]
Glinka D.
6-46-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Dussin L.
6-26-3
Ilagan A.
Delaney J.
6-46-757-66
Watt J.
Vithoontien L.
7-656-1
Zheng M.[6]
Jasika O.
6-46-2