Mikhail Kukushkin vs Cannon Kingsley — Nottingham CH Quarter-final

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Mikhail Kukushkin
KAZ
Mikhail Kukushkin
#305ATP
1552ELO
1510Grass ELO
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 January 2026
grass
USA
Cannon Kingsley
#429ATP
1342ELO
1371Grass ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWWLW
Kukushkin M.
6-2 7-5
Kingsley C.
Kukushkin M.
672
Kingsley C.
250

Mikhail Kukushkin defeated Cannon Kingsley 6-2 7-5 in the Nottingham CH quarter-final on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kukushkin M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Kingsley C.

Kingsley C.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kukushkin M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kukushkin M.Kingsley C.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.5
6.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
0.7
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (35 vs 23). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kukushkin M.Kingsley C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
46
21
Break points saved·Clear edge
93
74
Break points won·Clear edge
41
19
Deciding sets·Clear edge
41
27
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
44
21

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kukushkin M.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Kingsley C.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
7.1+139 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Grass Elo 1371
7.8Overall Elo 1552
ELO gap
2.2Overall Elo 1342
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
3.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kukushkin M.Kingsley C.
Freshness·
100
—

Kukushkin M.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Chidekh C.[2]
Monday J.[1]
5-76-27-65
Semi-finals
Monday J.[1]
Kukushkin M.
6-46-2
Chidekh C.[2]
Samuel T.[3]
6-35-76-3
Quarter-finals
Kukushkin M.
Kingsley C.
6-27-5
Samuel T.[3]
Kozlov S.[7]
7-616-4
Chidekh C.[2]
Broom C.
6-36-2
Monday J.[1]
Gentzsch T.[8]
6-16-3
R16
Monday J.[1]
Hussey G.
6-16-2
Gentzsch T.[8]
Krumich M.
4-66-37-63
Kukushkin M.
Negritu C.
6-26-1
Kingsley C.
Gray A.[6]
6-44-66-1
Kozlov S.[7]
Erhard M.
6-26-4
Broom C.
Ritschard A.
6-46-2
Chidekh C.[2]
Jubb P.
6-26-3
Samuel T.[3]
Broady L.
6-36-3
R32
Hussey G.
Guerrieri A.
6-46-4
Monday J.[1]
Maxted L.
4-67-656-4
Krumich M.
Kopp S.
6-16-2
Gentzsch T.[8]
Brunold M.
6-796-46-4
Negritu C.
Kuzmanov D.[4]
6-41-67-5
Kukushkin M.
Malige M.
6-36-0
Kingsley C.
Searle H.
6-46-1
Gray A.[6]
Gombos N.
6-13-66-1
Kozlov S.[7]
Zink T.
6-46-1
Erhard M.
Strombachs R.
7-653-67-65
Broady L.
Masur D.
6-34-66-3
Samuel T.[3]
Overbeck C.
6-26-4
Ritschard A.
Pereira T.[5]
7-656-1
Broom C.
Wendelken H.
7-56-3
Jubb P.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-36-737-64
Chidekh C.[2]
Matusevich A.
6-736-46-0