Cannon Kingsley vs Milos Karol — Nottingham CH Qualifying Round 1

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
USA
Cannon Kingsley
#429ATP
1342ELO
1371Grass ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 January 2026
grass
SVK5
Milos Karol
#445ATP
1393ELO
1397Grass ELO
23 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWWWL
Kingsley C.
4-6 7-6 6-4
Karol M.
Kingsley C.
47762
Karol M.
66241

Cannon Kingsley defeated Milos Karol 4-6 7-6 6-4 in the Nottingham CH qualifying round 1 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kingsley C.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Karol M.

Karol M.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Kingsley C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kingsley C.Karol M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Even
64%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.1
9.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.8
4.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (23 vs 14). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kingsley C.Karol M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
21
11
Break points saved·Even
74
75
Break points won·Clear edge
19
7
Deciding sets·Slight edge
27
18
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
20
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kingsley C.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Karol M.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
4.7Grass Elo 1371
Surface ELO
5.3+26 Grass Elo edge
4.4Overall Elo 1342
ELO gap
5.6Overall Elo 1393
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Masur D.
Story J.[8]
6-26-3
Guerrieri A.[12]
Arnaboldi F.[2]
6-46-4
Ritschard A.[11]
Mchugh A.[3]
6-766-26-2
Overbeck C.
Jones B.
7-636-4
Matusevich A.
Wiskandt M.[6]
6-07-64
Kingsley C.
Murgett F.
6-26-766-3
Q1
Murgett F.
Fenty A.[7]
6-07-5
Wiskandt M.[6]
Brady P.
6-26-2
Matusevich A.
Peliwo F.[10]
6-36-3
Masur D.
Yevseyev D.[1]
7-626-2
Story J.[8]
Bass F.
7-676-4
Arnaboldi F.[2]
Compagnucci T.
6-26-3
Guerrieri A.[12]
Hurrion M.
6-16-1
Mchugh A.[3]
Sheehy J.
6-46-746-3
Ritschard A.[11]
Ehrenschneider N.
6-34-66-3
Jones B.
Albot R.[4]
6-746-37-67
Overbeck C.
Vives Marcos P.[9]
4-67-627-63
Kingsley C.
Karol M.[5]
4-67-626-4