Alastair Gray vs Norbert Gombos — Nottingham CH Round of 32

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR6
Alastair Gray
#277ATP
1390ELO
1345Grass ELO
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 January 2026
grass
Norbert Gombos
SVK
Norbert Gombos
#364ATP
1472ELO
1418Grass ELO
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWL
Gray A.
6-1 3-6 6-1
Gombos N.
Gray A.
6362
Gombos N.
1611

Alastair Gray defeated Norbert Gombos 6-1 3-6 6-1 in the Nottingham CH round of 32 on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Alastair Gray closed it out in three sets, 6–1 3–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gray A.serving88% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Gombos N.

Gombos N.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Gray A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gray A.Gombos N.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
67%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.6
4.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (23 vs 18). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gray A.Gombos N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
15
41
Break points saved·Even
85
83
Break points won·Slight edge
2
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
13
70
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
20
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gray A.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 77 days (−1.2)
Gombos N.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
4.3Grass Elo 1345
Surface ELO
5.7+73 Grass Elo edge
4.0Overall Elo 1390
ELO gap
6.0Overall Elo 1472
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
4.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gray A.Gombos N.
Freshness·Even
69
69

Gray A.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 72 games (7d) · Gombos N.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 76 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Chidekh C.[2]
Monday J.[1]
5-76-27-65
Semi-finals
Monday J.[1]
Kukushkin M.
6-46-2
Chidekh C.[2]
Samuel T.[3]
6-35-76-3
Quarter-finals
Kukushkin M.
Kingsley C.
6-27-5
Samuel T.[3]
Kozlov S.[7]
7-616-4
Chidekh C.[2]
Broom C.
6-36-2
Monday J.[1]
Gentzsch T.[8]
6-16-3
R16
Monday J.[1]
Hussey G.
6-16-2
Gentzsch T.[8]
Krumich M.
4-66-37-63
Kukushkin M.
Negritu C.
6-26-1
Kingsley C.
Gray A.[6]
6-44-66-1
Kozlov S.[7]
Erhard M.
6-26-4
Broom C.
Ritschard A.
6-46-2
Chidekh C.[2]
Jubb P.
6-26-3
Samuel T.[3]
Broady L.
6-36-3
R32
Hussey G.
Guerrieri A.
6-46-4
Monday J.[1]
Maxted L.
4-67-656-4
Krumich M.
Kopp S.
6-16-2
Gentzsch T.[8]
Brunold M.
6-796-46-4
Negritu C.
Kuzmanov D.[4]
6-41-67-5
Kukushkin M.
Malige M.
6-36-0
Kingsley C.
Searle H.
6-46-1
Gray A.[6]
Gombos N.
6-13-66-1
Kozlov S.[7]
Zink T.
6-46-1
Erhard M.
Strombachs R.
7-653-67-65
Broady L.
Masur D.
6-34-66-3
Samuel T.[3]
Overbeck C.
6-26-4
Ritschard A.
Pereira T.[5]
7-656-1
Broom C.
Wendelken H.
7-56-3
Jubb P.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-36-737-64
Chidekh C.[2]
Matusevich A.
6-736-46-0