Bernard Tomic vs Daniil Glinka — Noumea CH Round of 32

Noumea CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Bernard Tomic
AUS8
Bernard Tomic
#204ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 January 2026
hard
EST
Daniil Glinka
#168ATP
1477ELO
1491Hard ELO
$127kYTD
$264kCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWLW
Tomic B.
6-4 6-3
Glinka D.
Tomic B.
662
Glinka D.
430

Bernard Tomic defeated Daniil Glinka 6-4 6-3 in the Noumea CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Bernard Tomic closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Glinka D.

Glinka D.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Serve advantage — Glinka D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Glinka D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.2
4.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.4
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (21 vs 29). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Glinka D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
23
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
82
Break points won·Slight edge
4
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
7
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
79
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Glinka D.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
4.3Hard Elo 1441
Surface ELO
5.7+50 Hard Elo edge
4.5Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1477
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
8.6
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Glinka D.
Freshness·Slight edge
75
81

Tomic B.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d) · Glinka D.: 3 days rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Gea A.
Rodionov J.[5]
6-34-67-5
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.[5]
Ellis B.
6-46-756-3
Gea A.
Zheng M.[6]
4-66-16-4
Quarter-finals
Ellis B.
Tomic B.[8]
7-643-66-4
Rodionov J.[5]
Thompson J.[1]
6-46-4
Zheng M.[6]
Tabur C.
3-66-46-2
Gea A.
Draxl L.[2]
6-36-2
R16
Tomic B.[8]
Watt J.
6-43-64-1
Zheng M.[6]
Added D.
6-26-1
Tabur C.
Droguet T.[3]
6-746-46-4
Draxl L.[2]
Bouzige M.
6-46-2
Thompson J.[1]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-46-3
Rodionov J.[5]
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Ellis B.
Ilagan A.
7-657-64
Gea A.
Diaz Acosta F.
7-656-3
R32
Thompson J.[1]
Hudd E.
6-37-65
Added D.
Sinclair C.
6-36-746-2
Tabur C.
Seyboth Wild T.
4-66-16-4
Droguet T.[3]
Onclin G.
6-36-2
Gea A.
Barrena A.[7]
6-46-0
Bouzige M.
Peniston R.
4-67-696-4
Draxl L.[2]
Heide G.
7-653-66-3
Rodionov J.[5]
Bernet H.
6-43-66-0
Ellis B.
Herbert P.[4]
7-54-66-4
Moreno De Alboran N.
Chazal M.
6-47-66
Langmo C.
Ogura K.
6-46-4
Tomic B.[8]
Glinka D.
6-46-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Dussin L.
6-26-3
Ilagan A.
Delaney J.
6-46-757-66
Watt J.
Vithoontien L.
7-656-1
Zheng M.[6]
Jasika O.
6-46-2