Jaime Faria vs Elmer Moller — Canberra CH Round of 32

Canberra CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
POR
Jaime Faria
#98ATP
1735ELO
1615Hard ELO
$531kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 January 2026
hard
DEN7
Elmer Moller
#147ATP
1609ELO
1484Hard ELO
$153kYTD
$725kCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWLW
Faria J.
6-1 6-3
Moller E.
Faria J.
662
Moller E.
130

Jaime Faria defeated Elmer Moller 6-1 6-3 in the Canberra CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Jaime Faria came in ranked #98.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Faria J.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Moller E.

Moller E.serving65% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Faria J.

Serve advantage — Faria J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Faria J.Moller E.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
63%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
56%
Return points won·Even
40%
42%
Break points saved·Even
59%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.7
2.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.6
5.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (41 vs 21). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Faria J.Moller E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
54
69
Break points saved·Slight edge
76
81
Break points won·Dominant
22
58
Deciding sets·Even
81
81
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
76
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Faria J.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Moller E.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
6.2+131 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Hard Elo 1484
5.7Overall Elo 1735
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1609
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
2.8
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
9.07-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Faria J.Moller E.
Freshness·Slight edge
86
94

Faria J.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Moller E.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Blockx A.[6]
Jodar R.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Blockx A.[6]
Mccabe J.
6-36-736-3
Jodar R.
Jacquet K.
6-30-0
Quarter-finals
Jodar R.
Shimabukuro S.
6-26-4
Jacquet K.
Lajovic D.[8]
7-627-5
Blockx A.[6]
Kopriva V.[1]
7-55-76-4
Mccabe J.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
6-17-65
R16
Kopriva V.[1]
Klein L.
7-617-61
Jacquet K.
Galan D.
6-26-4
Shimabukuro S.
Rodesch C.
7-657-63
Mccabe J.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-47-64
Blockx A.[6]
Carballes Baena R.
7-683-67-5
Barrios Vera T.[4]
Blanchet U.
6-766-37-64
Lajovic D.[8]
Engel J.
6-47-64
Jodar R.
Faria J.
6-16-4
R32
Pinnington Jones J.
Holt B.[5]
6-46-2
Engel J.
Mejia N.
7-661-67-66
Shimabukuro S.
Winter E.
6-46-1
Rodesch C.
Nardi L.[2]
7-646-2
Kopriva V.[1]
Nishikori K.
6-12-2
Mccabe J.
Lajal M.
7-637-68
Galan D.
Neumayer L.
7-57-5
Blanchet U.
Rocha H.
6-36-4
Lajovic D.[8]
Ofner S.
6-36-2
Klein L.
Cassone M.
4-67-56-3
Carballes Baena R.
Smith C.
7-646-3
Blockx A.[6]
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-26-3
Barrios Vera T.[4]
Sekulic P.
6-46-4
Jacquet K.
Nishioka Y.[3]
2-66-17-5
Faria J.
Moller E.[7]
6-16-3
Jodar R.
Jarry N.
6-36-4