Clement Tabur vs Titouan Droguet — Noumea CH Round of 16

Noumea CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#189ATP
1607ELO
1573Hard ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 January 2026
hard
Titouan Droguet
FRA3
Titouan Droguet
#116ATP
1717ELO
1650Hard ELO
$273kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLLWWWL
Tabur C.
6-7 6-4 6-4
Droguet T.
Tabur C.
64662
Droguet T.
77441

Clement Tabur defeated Titouan Droguet 6-7 6-4 6-4 in the Noumea CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Titouan Droguet came in ranked #116.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tabur C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Droguet T.

Droguet T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tabur C.Droguet T.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
55%
Service points won·Even
65%
68%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.4
9.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (32 vs 31). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tabur C.Droguet T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
29
64
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
88
Break points won·Slight edge
23
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
33
93
Tiebreaks·Dominant
40
87

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tabur C.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Droguet T.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
4.0Hard Elo 1573
Surface ELO
6.0+77 Hard Elo edge
3.6Overall Elo 1607
ELO gap
6.4Overall Elo 1717
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.0
Surface form
6.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tabur C.Droguet T.
Freshness·Clear edge
78
64

Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d) · Droguet T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 80 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Gea A.
Rodionov J.[5]
6-34-67-5
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.[5]
Ellis B.
6-46-756-3
Gea A.
Zheng M.[6]
4-66-16-4
Quarter-finals
Ellis B.
Tomic B.[8]
7-643-66-4
Rodionov J.[5]
Thompson J.[1]
6-46-4
Zheng M.[6]
Tabur C.
3-66-46-2
Gea A.
Draxl L.[2]
6-36-2
R16
Tomic B.[8]
Watt J.
6-43-64-1
Zheng M.[6]
Added D.
6-26-1
Tabur C.
Droguet T.[3]
6-746-46-4
Draxl L.[2]
Bouzige M.
6-46-2
Thompson J.[1]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-46-3
Rodionov J.[5]
Langmo C.
6-36-4
Ellis B.
Ilagan A.
7-657-64
Gea A.
Diaz Acosta F.
7-656-3
R32
Thompson J.[1]
Hudd E.
6-37-65
Added D.
Sinclair C.
6-36-746-2
Tabur C.
Seyboth Wild T.
4-66-16-4
Droguet T.[3]
Onclin G.
6-36-2
Gea A.
Barrena A.[7]
6-46-0
Bouzige M.
Peniston R.
4-67-696-4
Draxl L.[2]
Heide G.
7-653-66-3
Rodionov J.[5]
Bernet H.
6-43-66-0
Ellis B.
Herbert P.[4]
7-54-66-4
Moreno De Alboran N.
Chazal M.
6-47-66
Langmo C.
Ogura K.
6-46-4
Tomic B.[8]
Glinka D.
6-46-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Dussin L.
6-26-3
Ilagan A.
Delaney J.
6-46-757-66
Watt J.
Vithoontien L.
7-656-1
Zheng M.[6]
Jasika O.
6-46-2